Vitamin D and Calcium - AHRQ rejected most studies
REJECTION
They rejected studies using Vitamin D injections
They rejected studies using Vitamin D topically
They rejected studies using Vitamin D sublingually
They rejected studies using Vitamin D loading dose
They rejected studies using Vitamin D during pregnancy other than weight
They rejected studies using Vitamin D for infants - other than birth weight and length
They rejected studies using Vitamin D with cofactor such as Omega-3, Magnesium, etc (other than Calcium)
They rejected studies using Vitamin D which "showed effects only in those with lower serum 25(OH)D"
They rejected studies using Vitamin D for which there was no control group
example, rejected Turkish study where which EVERY infant got vitamin D ==> 60X reduction in rickets
Some doctors gave all patients vitamin D (because it was morally irresponsible to not do so)
Multiple Sclerosis was CURED in 90% of the patients (no control group)
They rejected studies using Vitamin D if they conflicted
- - previous studies often used far less vitamin D than recent studies
AHRQ rejects the possibility that 4000 IU can have far more benefit than 400 IU
Most people, but not AHRQ, will expect different results if add 20 ng to a baseline of 20 ng than same to a 40 ng baseline
They failed to reject studies which used more than 400 mg of Calcium along with Vitamin D
- > 400 mg is too much Calcium when there is an adequate amount of vitamin D
The few of the studies which were accepted were all published before April 2013
There have been a huge number of great studies since then.
📄 Download the Executive PDF from VitaminDWiki.
See also VitaminDWiki
Proof that Vitamin D Works by VitaminDWiki has the following summary
{include}