Items in both categories Breast Cancer and Vitamin D Receptor are listed here:
- Breast cancer associated with Vitamin D Receptor (14th study) – Oct 2019
- After breast cancer treatment 4,000 IU of Vitamin D was not enough to help if have poor Vitamin D receptor – June 2019
- Breast Cancer death 1.8 X more likely if poor Vitamin D Receptor – April 2019
- Breast Cancer and Vitamin D review – March 2018
- Women with Breast Cancer were 16.9 times more likely to have a poor Vitamin D Receptor – Jan 2019
- Cancer treatment by Vitamin D sometimes is restricted by genes – Oct 2018
- Two chemicals increase the Vitamin D receptor and decrease the growth of breast cancer cells in the lab - March 2018
- Breast Cancer reduces receptor expression and thus block Vitamin D to the cells– July 2017
- Vitamin D receptor as a target for breast cancer therapy (abstract only) – Feb 2017
- Breast Cancer was 4.6 times more likely if have a poor Vitamin D Receptor – Dec 2016
- Increased Breast Cancer metastasis if low vitamin D or poor VDR – Feb 2016
- Increased risk of some female cancers if low vitamin D (due to genes) – meta-analysis June 2015
- Vitamin D receptor in breasts and breast cancer vary with race – March 2013
- Breast Cancer incidence change by 40 percent with vitamin D receptor genes – Oct 2012
- Genes breast cancer and vitamin D receptor - Sept 2010
Compensate for poor VDR by increasing one or more:
|1) Vitamin D supplement|
Sun, Ultraviolet -B
| Vitamin D in the blood |
and thus in the cells
|2) Magnesium||Vitamin D in the blood |
AND in the cells
|3) Omega-3||Vitamin D in the cells|
|4) Resveratrol||Vitamin D Receptor|
|5) Intense exercise||Vitamin D Receptor|
|6) Get prescription for VDR activator|
|Vitamin D Receptor|
|7) Quercetin (flavonoid)||Vitamin D Receptor|
|8) Zinc is in the VDR||Vitamin D Receptor|
|9) Boron||Vitamin D Receptor ?, |
|10) Essential oils e.g. ginger, curcumin||Vitamin D Receptor|
|11) Progesterone||Vitamin D Receptor|
|12) Infrequent high concentration Vitamin D|
Increases the concentration gradient
|Vitamin D in the cells|
Note: If you are not feeling enough benefit from Vitamin D, you might try increasing VDR activation. You might feel the benefit within days of adding one or more of the above
Breast Cancer Research volume 21, Article number: 84 (2019)
Linnea Huss, Salma Tunå Butt, Signe Borgquist, Karin Elebro, Malte Sandsveden, Ann Rosendahl & Jonas Manjer
Vitamin D has been suggested to prevent and improve the prognosis of several cancers, including breast cancer. We have previously shown a U-shaped association between pre-diagnostic serum levels of vitamin D and risk of breast cancer-related death, with poor survival in patients with the lowest and the highest levels respectively, as compared to the intermediate group. Vitamin D exerts its functions through the vitamin D receptor (VDR), and the aim of the current study was to investigate if the expression of VDR in invasive breast tumors is associated with breast cancer prognosis.
VDR expression was evaluated in a tissue microarray of 718 invasive breast tumors. Covariation between VDR expression and established prognostic factors for breast cancer was analyzed, as well as associations between VDR expression and breast cancer mortality.
We found that positive VDR expression in the nuclei and cytoplasm of breast cancer cells was associated with favorable tumor characteristics such as smaller size, lower grade, estrogen receptor positivity and progesterone receptor positivity, and lower expression of Ki67. In addition, both intranuclear and cytoplasmic VDR expression were associated with a low risk of breast cancer mortality, hazard ratios 0.56 (95% CI 0.34–0.91) and 0.59 (0.30–1.16) respectively.
This study found that high expression of VDR in invasive breast tumors is associated with favorable prognostic factors and a low risk of breast cancer death. Hence, a high VDR expression is a positive prognostic factor.
Huss, Linnea LU PHD Dissertation
Download the Dissertation PDF from VitaminDWiki
Breast Cancer Survival if have low levels of Vitamin D at time of diagnosis
Note: Increase survival if increase Vitamin D and/or increase VDR activation
Previous research has suggested beneficial effects of vitamin D on both breast cancer risk and prognosis. The overall aim of this research project was to investigate associations between vitamin D and breast cancer. The population-based prospective cohort, the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study, recruited 17,034 women in the first half of the 1990s. Studies in in the current thesis are based on blood samples collected at baseline, analyzed for levels of vitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium and later also used for genetic sequencing. Breast tumors that developed in women within the cohort were included in a tissue microarray and analyzed for expression of the vitamin D receptor (VDR).
Specific aims were to investigate:
- I. Serum levels of vitamin D, PTH and calcium in relation to breast cancer survival, i.e. mortality among women diagnosed with breast cancer.
- II. Vitamin D-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and breast cancer risk.
- III. Expression of VDR in association with breast cancer mortality.
- IV. Levels of vitamin D in relation to expression of VDR in subsequent breast tumors.
Results and conclusions:
- I. Compared to intermediate levels of vitamin D, low levels and high levels were associated with a poor survival, i.e. high risk of death related to breast cancer. No association was found between PTH and breast cancer mortality. Relatively high serum calcium levels were associated with relatively low breast cancer mortality.
- II. SNPs associated with levels of vitamin D did not affect breast cancer risk. One SNP, related to the vitamin D binding protein, was associated with breast cancer risk.
- III. VDR expression was associated with a favorable breast cancer prognosis.
- IV. There were indications that vitamin D levels were associated with VDR expression in a subsequent breast tumor.
The association between low vitamin D levels and high breast cancer mortality may be mediated through development of a VDR-negative tumor. There was no evidence to suggest an additional beneficiary effect of vitamin D levels higher than intermediate levels.Title was revised July 2019 caused the visitor count to reset.
There have actually been