Loading...
 
Translate Register Log In Login with facebookLogin and Register

Vitamin D and fractures – 24 meta-analyses and counting – Dec 2014

A Case Study of Discordant Overlapping Meta-Analyses: Vitamin D Supplements and Fracture.

PLoS One. 2014 Dec 31;9(12):e115934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115934. eCollection 2014.
Bolland MJ1, Grey A1.

BACKGROUND:
Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic are now very common, and discordant results often occur. To explore why discordant results arise, we examined a common topic for overlapping meta-analyses- vitamin D supplements and fracture.

METHODS AND FINDINGS:
We identified 24 meta-analyses of vitamin D (with or without calcium) and fracture in a PubMed search in October 2013, and analysed a sample of 7 meta-analyses in the highest ranking general medicine journals. We used the AMSTAR tool to assess the quality of the meta-analyses, and compared their methodologies, analytic techniques and results. Applying the AMSTAR tool suggested the meta-analyses were generally of high quality. Despite this, there were important differences in trial selection, data extraction, and analytical methods that were only apparent after detailed assessment. 25 trials were included in at least one meta-analysis. Four meta-analyses included all eligible trials according to the stated inclusion and exclusion criteria, but the other 3 meta-analyses "missed" between 3 and 8 trials, and 2 meta-analyses included apparently ineligible trials. The relative risks used for individual trials differed between meta-analyses for total fracture in 10 of 15 trials, and for hip fracture in 6 of 12 trials, because of different outcome definitions and analytic approaches. The majority of differences (11/16) led to more favourable estimates of vitamin D efficacy compared to estimates derived from unadjusted intention-to-treat analyses using all randomised participants.

The conclusions of the meta-analyses were discordant, ranging from strong statements that vitamin D prevents fractures to equally strong statements that vitamin D without calcium does not prevent fractures.

CONCLUSIONS:
Substantial differences in trial selection, outcome definition and analytic methods between overlapping meta-analyses led to discordant estimates of the efficacy of vitamin D for fracture prevention. Strategies for conducting and reporting overlapping meta-analyses are required, to improve their accuracy and transparency.

PMID: 25551377
 Download the PDF from VitaminDWiki.


Note: Great trials which included something other than Calcium – such as Magnesium and Vitamin K2 – were not considered in the meta-analyses, as they did not fit in.

See also VitaminDWiki

Pages listed in BOTH the categories Falls/Fractures and Meta-analysis

Vitamin D and fractures – 24 meta-analyses and counting – Dec 2014        

2918 visitors, last modified 24 Jul, 2015, URL:

Printer Friendly PDF this page! Follow this page for updates

Attached files

ID Name Comment Uploaded Size Downloads
4805 Fracture meta-meta-analysis.pdf PDF 2014 admin 01 Jan, 2015 16:36 269.09 Kb 582
See any problem with this page? Report it (FINALLY WORKS)