Power determination in vitamin D randomised control trials and characterising factors affecting it through a novel simulation-based tool
Sci Rep. 2021 May 24;11(1):10804. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90019-7.
Jason Wyse # 1, Rebecca Mangan # 2 3, Lina Zgaga # 4
Table of Contents
Download the PDF from VitaminDWiki
Thousands of observational studies have linked vitamin D deficiency with numerous diseases, but randomised controlled trials (RCTs) often fail to show benefit of supplementation. Population characteristics and trial design have long been suspected to undermine power but were not systematically investigated. We propose a flexible generative model to characterise benefit of vitamin D supplementation at the individual level, and use this to quantify power in RCTs. The model can account for seasonality and population heterogeneity.
In a simulated 1-year trial with 1000 participants per arm and assuming a 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) increase of 20 nmol/L due to the intervention, with baseline 25OHD in the population of 15, 35, 50, 60 and 75 nmol/L, the power to detect intervention effect was 77%, 99%, 95%, 68% and 19%, respectively. The number of participants required per arm to achieve 80% power according to baseline 25OHD of 15-60 nmol/L was 1200, 400, 600 and 1400, respectively.
As expected, larger increases in 25OHD due to supplementation improved power in certain scenarios. For a population baseline of 50 nmol/L, with 1500 participants in each arm, there was 100% power to detect a 20 nmol/L 25OHD increase while it was 76% for a 10 nmol/L increase. Population characteristics and trial design, including temporal considerations, have a dramatic impact on power and required sample size in vitamin D RCTs.
The following table appears to be the likely hood for detecting a 20 nmol increase in Vitamin D levels for 1,000 people in 6 months
The following graph is the result of a simulation, not real data