The Impact of Living in Rural and Urban Areas: Vitamin D and Medical Costs in Veterans
Beth A. Bailey PhD1, Todd Manning BA2, Alan N. Peiris MD, PhD 2,3
1 Department of Family Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee
2 Mountain Home Veterans Administration Medical Center, Mountain Home, Tennessee
3 Department of Internal Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee
© 2012 National Rural Health Association
The Journal of Rural Health, Article first published online: 4 APR 2012, DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2012.00407.x
Purpose: Living in a rural region is associated with significant health disparities and increased medical costs. Vitamin D deficiency, which is increasingly common, is also associated with many adverse health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether rural-urban residence status of veterans was related to vitamin D levels, and to determine if this factor also influenced medical costs/service utilization. Additionally explored was whether vitamin D differences accounted for part of the association between area of residence and medical costs/service utilization.
Methods: Medical records of 9,396 veterans from 6 Veterans Administration Medical Centers were reviewed for variables of interest including county of residence, vitamin D level, medical costs and service utilization, and background variables. Rurality status was classified as large metropolitan, urban, and rural.
Findings: The 3 rurality status groups differed significantly in vitamin D levels, with the highest levels observed for urban residents, followed by rural residents, and the lowest for large metro residents. Compared with urban residents, large metro residents were 49% more likely, while rural residents were 20% more likely, to be vitamin D deficient. Both rural and large metro residents had higher medical costs, and they were significantly more likely to be hospitalized. Vitamin D levels explained a statistically significant amount of the relationship between rurality status and medical costs/service utilization.
Conclusions: Vitamin D deficiency may be an additional health disparity experienced by both rural and inner-city veterans, and patients residing in these locations should be considered at increased risk for deficiency and routinely tested.
- - - - - - -
From Medscape
ng/ml | Costs for outpatient care | Cost for inpatient care | |
Urban | 29.5 | $5455 | $20,294 |
Rural | 28.0 | $6268 | $23,275 |
Metro | 27.5 | $7493 | $25,057 |
See also VitaminDWiki
- Black veterans have worse health and low vitamin D, yet are not tested as much – June 2011
Authors = Peiris AN, Bailey BA, Peiris P, Copeland RJ, Manning T. - Vitamin D might reduce military costs for UC and CD – June 2011
Authors = Atia, Antwan; Murthy, Ravindra; Bailey, Beth A; Manning, Todd; Garrett, Linda L; Youssef, Dima; Peiris, Alan N - VA found less testing for vitamin D resulted in increased health costs – Jan 2012
Authors = Bailey, Beth Manning, Todd; Peiris, Alan N alan.peiris at va.gov - Blacks living in urban area vs rural have less vitamin D if older than 50 – Oct 2011
Candidate reasons for decrease of vitamin D in urban area include:
Air pollution/haze reduces the UVB needed to make vitamin D
Not go outdoors as much in urban area (feel less safe, availability of air conditioning, lack of garden) - All items noontime sun and Vitamin D All items in category Predict Vitamin D]
331 items - Urban residents had 2X less vitamin D – 2008
- 4X more suburban UV than urban UV – Nov 2010
- An overview analysis of the time people spend outdoors – Dec 2010
- Air pollution reduces UV and thus vitamin D - Aug 2010
- Another urban area in a sunny climate is vitamin D deficiency – Bangkok Nov 2011
- 27 reasons why vitamin D deficiency has become epidemic - and counting
- All items in category Predict Vitamin D
82 items Urban residents have the most vitamin D, metro residents the least – April 2012735 visitors, last modified 01 Dec, 2013, This page is in the following categories (# of items in each category)