Pages tagged with "Vitamin D + Response"

152 pages, most important first (overviews, then meta-analyses, then RCTs, then newest). Combine with another topic

• Response to Vitamin D: summary chart of 8 studies
• Overview Vitamin D Dose-Response
• Response to Vitamin D - many studies
• CYP2R1 gene reduces response to Vitamin D - many studies
• Weekly Vitamin D better than daily – lower cost, less pill burden, perhaps 1.5X better response – meta-analysis
• Vitamin D given daily, weekly, or monthly has similar response (116 RCTs) – meta-analysis
• 1.77 nmol response to 100 IU of Vitamin D (46 RCTs) – meta-analysis
• Vitamin D response independent of dosing interval – meta-analysis
• 3X variation in response to dose of vitamin D – meta-analysis
• Vitamin D response reduced if taken with Calcium – meta-analysis
• The liposomal form of Vitamin D had the best response - RCT
• Response to Vitamin D varies with Vitamin D Binding Protein gene – RCT
• Poor protein binding gene associated with poor Vitamin D response – RCT
• Autistics have half of the response to Vitamin D – RCT
• ICU patients 6X more likely to die if poor response to 570,000 IU of Vitamin D – RCT
• Dietary fat increased Vitamin D response by 32% – RCT
• Children had a better response to Vitamin D given every 2 weeks than daily – RCT
• 50,000 IU Vitamin D once every 2 weeks – response was 34 ng – RCT
• Response to infant 2,000 IU Vitamin D daily was in 194 ng, monthly dosing was 20% less – RCT
• Vitamin D response: 800 IU: 20 ng, 3200 IU: 45 ng – RCT
• Smoking does not decrease response to monthly Vitamin D – RCT
• Colorectal Cancer – vitamin D did not help (too small of a response) – RCT
• Short-term response to 1,000 IU of Vitamin D tripled in obese when Magnesium was added – RCT
• Response to Vitamin D varies with genes (3,000 IU, weight loss in this RCT)
• Stoss (loading) dose of vitamin D resulted in bigger response at 30 days (again) – RCT
• Sublingual vitamin D gave similar response as oral for most, and better for some – RCT
• Weekly response to semi-activated vitamin D slightly better than standard – RCT
• 24 ng lower response to Vitamin D due to obesity, low initial Vitamin D, and genetics – RCT
• Response to 150,000 IU vitamin D once vs 5,000 IU daily – RCT
• Monthly vitamin D dosing had higher response than 3 per month – RCT
• Less response to 800 IU of Vitamin D by Africans than natives in Finland – RCT
• 25 minutes of daily sun provided less than half of the response as 500 IU of vitamin D (Korea) – RCT
• Monthly Vitamin D had a 20 percent better response than quarterly – small RCT
• Vitamin D response time is 3-6 months, not much benefit in first 4 months – RCT
• No genetic response to 4,000 IU of Vitamin D (other studies disagree) – RCT
• Estrogen contraception pill doubled the response to 1,000 IU of vitamin D – RCT
• Response to 1000 IU of vitamin D varies by about 4 percent due to gene variants – RCT
• Vitamin D daily or weekly dosing resulted in similar response -RCT
• Spray and oral forms of 3000 IU vitamin D provide similar long-term response – RCT
• CYP2R1 gene probably responsible for low vitamin D response – RCT
• Immune System response of infants is associated with higher levels of vitamin D – RCT
• How to predict response to a vitamin D dose – RCT
• Gut E. coli from depressed patients lowered vitamin D and caused depression-like behavior in mice
• More muscle response when have adequate vitamin D
• Poor Vitamin D response 4X more likely if poor Vitamin D binding proteins
• Vitamin D-binding protein controls T cell responses to vitamin D in the lab
• COVID, influenza, hepatitis B, measles, etc. vaccine responses vary with Vitamin D and its receptor
• Vitamin D injection of 600,000 IU (response by 10 individuals)
• 600,000 vitamin D loading doses – good response to both oral and muscular
• Vitamin D can start working in minutes — if you pick the right form
• Liposomal Vitamin D raises blood levels 5X faster
• Tendon pain 7 X more likely if very poor response to weekly 50,000 IU Vitamin D
• 10 reasons for poor response to Vitamin D (race, binding protein, etc.)
• Graph of weekly response to monthly vitamin D supplementation
• 40 ng response to 4,000 IU daily Vitamin D for 2 months (and 60 ng for 8,000 IU)
• Liposomal Vitamin D appears to have a 3X faster and better response
• Glutathione should improve response to Vitamin D
• COVID booster: 3.9 X better response if good levels of both Vitamin D and Zinc
• Obese have a slow, decreased response to 700 IU of Vitamin D
• Factors that increase Vitamin D response for the GRH cohort
• Obese women had larger response to oral v.s. injected Vitamin D
• Vitamin D targets 61 Immune system genes (based on response to 80,000 IU)
• Huge variation in response to vitamin D supplementation – personal vitamin D response index
• Familial Mediterranean fever – poor response to colchicine if low vitamin D
• Response to Vitamin D – 25% high, 24% low (ignores other than genes)
• Vitamin D response varies from resistance that increases through life to hypersensitivity
• Wheezing and asthmatic children have weaker Vitamin D responses
• Vitamin D responses to as much as 15,000 IU per day
• No response to Vitamin D was 11 X more likely to have if poor Binding gene
• Those with Asthma or COPD had half the response to Vitamin D
• People with Multiple Sclerosis have blunted responses to Vitamin D supplementation
• Beans etc, can cut in half the response to fat-soluble Vitamin D and K
• Vitamin D that dissolves in mouth helps those having poor response due to poor guts, HSCT etc.
• Vitamin D response in post-menopausal women: weekly better than monthly, notice benefit in 3 months
• Response to Vitamin D fortification varies from 1 to 10 nmol per 100 IU daily – review
• Gene variants can reduce Vitamin D response by 1.7X (14,000 IU daily, Multiple Sclerosis)
• Fast responses to Vitamin D – loading dose, nanoemulsion and Calcifediol
• Response to a large dose of vitamin D (80,000 IU) typically varied by 2 X
• No response to vitamin D 7X more likely if poor CYP24A1 or VDBP genes
• Poor CYP2R1 gene reduces blood response to Vitamin D supplementation
• Increased Vitamin D response if take cofactors, etc
• Antibody response to COVID vaccination appears independent of Vitamin D levels
• Vitamin D spray results in bigger response than drops
• Responses to 3600 IU Vitamin D or Calcifediol
• Poor or no response to vitamin D was associated with poor genes (cystic fibrosis, 4 genes)
• Better response 6 months after Pfizer vaccinations if higher vitamin D
• Vitamin D improves Sinovac vaccine (fast innate response)
• Better response to shingles virus after 6,400 IU Vitamin D raised above 40 ng
• Response and adverse effects of 20,000 and 30,000 IU Vitamin D weekly
• Cancers are associated with low vitamin D, poor vaccination response and perhaps poor VDR
• Surgeries often deplete Vitamin D - 300,000 IU resulted in little response
• Multiple Sclerosis treated by Vitamin D (includes dose-response)
• Response to 1,000 IU of vitamin D daily for 6 months – 40 percent above 30 ng (small study)
• COVID vaccination: 29 percent higher antibody response if more than 20 ng of vitamin D
• Poor response to Asthma inhaler if poor Vitamin D Receptor
• Responses by healthy individuals to 2,000 IU vitamin D daily
• Vaccine response improved by Vitamin D (Shingles in this case)
• Vitamin D, C, A, and E, as well as Iron, Se, and Zinc each augment vaccine response
• On-line Vitamin D response simulation
• Response to Vitamin D increased if take Magnesium and Vitamin K2 – Grassroots
• Obese children had 2.2 X less response to a single dose of Vitamin D
• Poor response to vitamin D supplementation if poor level of B Vitamins (rats in this case)
• Response to vitamin D increased 30 percent with Magnesium
• Poor responses to UV and Vitamin D were correlated to just 4 poor genes
• Decreased response to vitamin D in white children having poor Vitamin D binding gene
• Vitamin D injections should not be used if fast response is needed (COVID-19 in this case)
• Parathyroid response to Vitamin D among obese
• Based on PTH response, obese adolescents may not need and much vitamin D as non-obese (12 ng vs 16.5 ng)
• Hemodialysis associated with very poor mRNA response (wonder if low vitamin D)
• Response to Vitamin D varied by 12 ng due to gene variants (CYP2R1)
• How you might double your response to vitamin D
• Genes are one of the reasons for low response to vitamin D
• Vitamin D – individual responses to 100,000 IU
• Immune response to respiratory viruses – vitamin D connection – review
• Response by obese to weekly 50,000 IU of Vitamin D
• Low response to vitamin D for some people – genes are one of the causes
• CYP2R1 and GC variations decrease vitamin D response – PHD thesis
• Inflammation and immune responses to Vitamin D (perhaps need to measure active vitamin D)
• Some people need more vitamin D to get the same response – perhaps due to genes
• Poor ovarian response (poor IVF) associated with low vitamin D
• Large variability in response to UV (more than response to oral Vitamin D)
• Single dose of Vitamin D as gummies resulted in higher blood response than hard tablets
• Poor Vitamin D binding had 30 percent less response to Vitamin D (50,000 IU weekly)
• 40 ng response plateau to 2000 to 4,000 IU of vitamin D
• Multiple Sclerosis patients need more vitamin D to get same blood level response
• Hypothesis: Magnesium accounts for some of the variation in vitamin D response
• Activation (methylation) of CYP2R1 and CYP24A1 predict response to dose of vitamin D
• Poor response to Osteoporosis medicine (risedronate) if vitamin D less than 16 ng
• Pigs have about 2X less variation in response to calcidiol as humans do to vitamin D – 2015
• Vitamin D injection helped migrants a bit, but some had poor or even negative responses
• Vitamin D injection lasts longer and has bigger response than weekly oral
• Immune response was poor in mice and humans with low vitamin D and low vitamin A
• RF from mobile phones reduced immune response in rats, unless they had vitamin D
• Response to Vitamin D - Grassroots
• Dose response equations for Vitamin D
• PTH boosts immune response when vitamin D levels are low
• Response to Vitamin D supplementation
• Different response by Vitamin D Receptor to Vitamin D vs Vit. D analogs
• If at high risk of vitamin D deficiency, get a higher response if take more Magnesium
• Better response to Inflammatory Bowel Disease drug if more than 30 ng of vitamin D
• Low dose Vitamin D during pregnancy and infancy results in strange acute respiratory infection response
• Obese need 2X as much vitamin D to get the same response
• Response to vitamin D related to DBP and CYP2RI genes
• Similar response to Vitamin D supplements by senior white and black women
• Response to high dose vitamin D is limited by vitamin A
• 40 percent less likely to get adequate vitamin D response if have certain genes
• Response to Vitamin D3 varied with rs4588, D2 less response than D3 and did not change
• Difference in Fok gene reduced response to vitamin D by 35 percent
• Response by Masterjohn on vitamin A thwarting vitamin D
• Metabolites and genes may predict responses to Calcium and Vitamin D
• More response to 1100 IU vitamin D in cold season or less BMI
• Would be nice to capture and share vitamin D dose /response / benefit information