US Medical care is sometimes avoided due to cost, distance, not help, etc
Which Americans Avoid Medical Care Because of Cost, Distance, or Time — and How Many
About 17% of US adults delayed or went without some form of health care in the past year because of cost. Adding non-cost barriers — distance, no transportation, no paid time off — brings the total who actually forwent needed care to roughly 20–25%. Including dental care and prescription rationing, self-reported rates run 36–43%. The population structurally exposed to these barriers — low income, uninsured, rural, in a provider shortage area, or without a vehicle — is closer to 30–35%, about 100–120 million people.
The single most important finding for anyone designing a low-cost intervention: the barrier is concentrated, not evenly spread. Low income is the master variable. Rural residence, being uninsured, having no car, having no sick leave, and American Indian/Alaska Native status all correlate strongly with it — and with each other.
1. The headline number: cost barriers to medical care
From the 2024 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), the federal government's primary health-access survey:
| Measure | % of adults |
|---|---|
| Delayed or went without any health care due to cost | 17% |
| Delayed or went without medical care specifically | 10% |
The gap between the two is dental care and prescriptions — covered in sections 2 and 3.
Who, specifically
| Group | Delayed / went without care, cost |
|---|---|
| Uninsured | 31% |
| Insured | 8% |
| Below 200% of Federal Poverty Level | 23% |
| 200–400% FPL | 19% |
| Above 400% FPL | 12% |
| Adults under 65 | 20% |
| Adults 65 and older | 8% |
| In worse self-reported health | 28% |
| In better self-reported health | 15% |
| Black adults | 19% |
| Asian adults | 9% |
A separate, stricter measure. Gallup classifies 11% of US adults — about 29 million people — as "Cost Desperate," meaning unable to afford or access needed care and medicine at all. That rises to 25% for households under $24,000 and 19% for $24,000–$48,000. A further 35% say they cannot access affordable quality care when they need it — a record high. (Gallup, Nov–Dec 2024, n=6,296.)
2. Dental care — the largest single cost barrier
Dental care is where cost bites hardest, because dental coverage is separate from medical coverage and far weaker.
| Group | Delayed / went without dental care due to cost |
|---|---|
| All adults | 21% |
| Uninsured | 47% |
| Insured | 19% |
| Under 65 | 23% |
| 65 and older | 16% |
| Hispanic adults | 31% |
| In worse health | 34% |
| In better health | 19% |
Why dental is worse than medical: the coverage gap is structural
| Group | Lacks dental benefits |
|---|---|
| Children (0–18) | 7% |
| Working-age adults (19–64) | 21% |
| Adults 65+ | 55% |
Traditional Medicare does not cover routine dental care. Nearly 65% of Medicare beneficiaries — about 37 million people — have no dental coverage, and 49% had no dental visit in the past year. Among those who did use dental services, 19% spent more than $1,000 out of pocket. Non-coverage rates are higher among Black and Hispanic beneficiaries and those with low incomes.
This is the one place where the low-wealth elderly clearly do face a cost barrier — see the caution in section 6.
3. Prescription drugs — cost-driven rationing
Two measures exist, and they differ by an order of magnitude because they ask different questions.
Strict federal measure (NHIS / NCHS)
Among adults 18–64 who take prescription medication, 8.2% did not take it as prescribed in order to reduce costs — about 9.2 million adults. The behaviors counted are skipping doses, taking less than prescribed, and delaying filling a prescription.
| Group | Did not take medication as prescribed, to save money |
|---|---|
| All adults 18–64 on medication | 8.2% |
| Uninsured | 22.9% |
| No prescription drug coverage | 18.1% |
| Medicaid | 8.0% |
| Private insurance | 6.5% |
| Adults with disabilities | 20.0% |
| Adults without disabilities | 7.1% |
| Fair or poor health | 18.0% |
| Good or better health | 6.3% |
| Below 100% FPL | 14.5% |
| 100–199% FPL | 13.8% |
| 200–399% FPL | 9.9% |
| Above 400% FPL | 3.9% |
| Women | 9.1% |
| Men | 7.0% |
| Black adults | 10.4% |
| Hispanic adults | 10.4% |
| White adults | 7.4% |
| Asian adults | 6.8% |
The 2024 NHIS finds a similar magnitude: about 8% rationing medications and 6% not getting a needed medication to save money.
Broad self-report measure (KFF)
Asked more expansively, 43% of adults say they did not take a medication as prescribed because of cost in the past 12 months:
| Behavior | % of adults |
|---|---|
| Used an over-the-counter drug instead of a prescription | 31% |
| Did not fill a prescription | 27% |
| Cut pills in half or skipped doses | 19% |
| Any of the above | 43% |
| Breakdown | Groups |
|---|---|
| By income | 52% under $40,000 · 47% at $40–90,000 · 30% above $90,000 |
| By insurance | 58% uninsured · 43% insured |
| By race | 55% Black · 47% Hispanic · 40% White |
| By sex | 49% women · 36% men |
The same KFF polling finds 36% of adults skipped or postponed needed health care due to cost — rising to 75% among uninsured adults under 65.
Why the two prescription measures differ so much: the NHIS asks a narrow question of people currently on medication, in a clinical-survey context; KFF asks a broad question of all adults in a telephone poll and counts OTC substitution. Both are correct for what they measure. Cite the 8% when you need a defensible federal floor; cite the 43% when describing the full spectrum of cost-driven compromise.
4. Non-cost barriers: distance, transportation, and time
Provider supply and distance. 92 million people — about 27% of the US population — live in a designated primary care Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA). Of the 8,466 designated primary care HPSAs, 63.1% are rural.
Rural population. 19.3% (64.5 million people) by the federal Office of Rural Health Policy definition; 20% (66.3 million) by the Census definition, covering 97% of US land area.
| Group | Missed needed care due to transportation |
|---|---|
| All non-elderly adults | 5% |
| Below 138% FPL | 14% |
| Adults with disabilities | 17% |
| On public insurance | 12% |
| No household vehicle | 13% |
| No vehicle + fair/poor transit | 21% |
| No vehicle + good transit | 9% |
Time off work. No clean national figure exists for "avoided care because I didn't want to take time off." The closest proxy: roughly two-thirds of low-wage workers have no paid sick days. This barrier is real but overlaps almost entirely with the low-income group already counted — treat it as a mechanism, not an additional population.
5. American Indian and Alaska Native populations
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| AIAN alone or in combination | 7.2 million (~2% of US) |
| AIAN alone | 1.7 million |
| Uninsured, AIAN alone, under 65 | 21% (3× the White rate of 7%) |
| Living on reservations or land trusts | 13% |
The Indian Health Service is chronically underfunded relative to need.
Interpretation: this is a high-severity, small-population group. It matters enormously for equity and for targeted programs, but at ~2% of the population it cannot move a national percentage. Report it as a severity finding, not a volume finding.
6. Two cautions before combining these numbers
Caution 1 — the elderly are the least cost-blocked group for medical care. At 8%, adults 65+ report the lowest cost barriers of any age group, and only 4% are "cost desperate" in Gallup's measure. Medicare works for medical care. The intuition that low-wealth seniors skip care because of cost is not supported for medical care — but it is supported for dental (55% have no coverage, 49% no visit last year) and for transportation and mobility. Place seniors under the right heading.
Caution 2 — these groups overlap almost completely; do not add them. Low income, rural residence, being uninsured, lacking a vehicle, lacking sick leave, and AIAN status are strongly correlated with one another. Adding 23% + 20% + 5% + 2% would count the same households three or four times. Any combined estimate must be de-duplicated.
7. The combined estimate
| Definition | Share of US | Approx. people |
|---|---|---|
| Forwent needed medical care last year, cost only | ~10% | ~26 million |
| Forwent any health care last year, cost only | 17% | ~44 million |
| "Cost desperate" — cannot afford care or medicine at all | 11% | ~29 million |
| Forwent dental care, cost | 21% | ~55 million |
| Forwent needed care — any barrier (cost, distance, transport, time) | ~20–25% | ~70–85 million |
| Rationed prescriptions, strict federal measure | 8% | ~9 million |
| Structurally exposed (low income, uninsured, rural, shortage area, no vehicle) | ~30–35% | ~100–120 million |
| Broad self-report incl. dental and Rx compromise | 36–43% | ~120–145 million |
Recommended figures to cite
- 20% — "avoided needed medical care in the past year." Defensible, conservative, close to the NHIS 17% once non-cost barriers are added.
- 30% — "population at structural risk of avoiding care." The more useful number for estimating who could benefit from something low-cost and self-administered, because it includes people who have not yet skipped care but would if they needed it.
- 40% — "experienced any cost-driven compromise in care, including dental and prescriptions." Accurate, but requires the broader definition to be stated explicitly.
What this does NOT show
- These percentages come from different surveys with different question wording, reference periods, and populations. They cannot be added together. NHIS asks about the past 12 months of a household sample; Gallup and KFF are telephone polls with broader questions; the dental figures are 2023 while the medical figures are 2024 and the strict prescription figures are 2021.
- None of these are measures of health outcomes. "Delayed care" does not establish that harm resulted. Some deferred care is low-value care that would not have changed anything.
- "Avoiding care" is self-reported and subject to recall and social-desirability effects in both directions — people under-report skipping care they feel embarrassed about, and over-report cost as a reason when the real reason was inconvenience or fear.
- The prescription figures do not distinguish essential from non-essential medication, nor do they establish clinical consequence.
- No causal claim is made that removing a cost or distance barrier would produce a proportional increase in care received, or in health.
- The 30–35% "structurally exposed" figure is an estimate, de-duplicated by judgment rather than by individual-level record linkage. It should be presented as an approximation, not a survey result.
- The HPSA count (92 million) measures provider supply in an area, not whether any individual actually failed to get care. Many people in shortage areas receive adequate care.
Source table
| # | Source | Publisher | Survey / year | Used for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | How does cost affect access to healthcare? | Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker | NHIS 2023 & 2024 | Medical and dental cost barriers; all demographic breakdowns |
| 2 | Inability to Pay for Care, Medicine Hits New High | Gallup | Nov–Dec 2024, n=6,296 | "Cost desperate" 11%; income and race breakdowns |
| 3 | Americans' Challenges with Health Care Costs | KFF | Health Tracking Polls 2025–2026 | Broad self-report: 36% skipped care, 43% Rx compromise |
| 4 | NCHS Data Brief No. 470 | CDC / NCHS | NHIS 2021 | Strict Rx non-adherence 8.2%; full demographic table |
| 5 | Coverage, Access & Outcomes | American Dental Association HPI | Ongoing | Dental benefit gaps by age (7% / 21% / 55%) |
| 6 | Most Medicare Beneficiaries Lack Dental Coverage | KFF | Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey | 65% / 37M without dental; 49% no visit; out-of-pocket costs |
| 7 | State of the Primary Care Workforce 2025 | HRSA Bureau of Health Workforce | 2025 | 92M in primary care HPSAs; 63.1% rural |
| 8 | What Is Rural? | HRSA Federal Office of Rural Health Policy | 2020 Census | Rural population 19.3% / 64.5M |
| 9 | Transportation Barriers to Health Care | Urban Institute / RWJF | 2022 survey, published 2023 | Transportation barriers, 5% overall to 21% concentrated |
| 10 | Key Data on Health Care for AIAN People | KFF | Multiple federal sources | AIAN population, uninsured rate, IHS funding |
| 11 | Access to paid sick leave remains highly unequal | Economic Policy Institute | BLS National Compensation Survey | Paid sick leave gap for low-wage workers |
Related
- Vitamin D as a low-cost intervention reachable without a clinic visit
- Populations with low vitamin D levels and low health care access
- Cost of vitamin D supplementation vs. cost of a physician visit
Page compiled August 2026. Figures reflect the most recent survey year available for each measure: NHIS medical data 2024, dental data 2023, strict prescription data 2021. Where a people-count is shown it was derived from the cited percentage applied to current population estimates, and is approximate.
Related in VitaminDWiki
US Healthcare Costs
- $371,000 healthcare estimated cost for a couple retiring in 2026— nearly double what the typical household has saved
- US Healthcare spending to consume 20% of GDP by 2028
- Total cost of health insurance for a US family exceeds their mortgage
- Cost of US health exceeds the cost of food
- U.S. healthcare system (and its investors) are really good at monetizing illness, but not wellness
- US Healthcare is 2X more expensive than in other countries - what can be done
Vitamin D
- Perhaps 4,000 dollars annual less health care costs per person if supplemented with 5 dollars of Vitamin D
- VA showed increased vitamin D associated with lower health costs - Lancet
- 5000 IU Vitamin D daily resulted in lower health care costs - RCT
- Vitamin D once during pregnancy reduced infant health care costs (300 times ROI) – RCT