Loading...
 

Overview Pregnancy and vitamin D

Vitamin D before, during, and after pregnancy  =alternate name
The more vitamin D for mom, the more benefits for both of them

  • The benefits to mom start about 2,000 IU daily average (2000 IU costs less than $15 per year)
  • Substantial benefits proven for 4,000 IU taken during pregnancy (fewer complications, lower cost)
  • Best benefits at 6,000 IU - this much is also needed if breast feeding without supplementing the infant
  • Taking > 2,000 IU raises the cost, primarily due to cost of Cofactors.


Summary of Pregnancy page by Chat-GPT as of Feb 28, 2025

Vitamin D plays a critical role in pregnancy and fetal development. The VitaminDWiki page provides a comprehensive overview of how adequate vitamin D before, during, and after pregnancy benefits both mother and child. It compiles research findings, dosage recommendations, and outcomes related to vitamin D status in pregnancy. Overall, higher vitamin D intake is associated with better pregnancy outcomes (fewer complications) and improved infant health, while vitamin D deficiency in pregnant women is widespread and linked to various risks.

Optimal Vitamin D Intake During Pregnancy
A higher daily vitamin D dose is recommended for expecting mothers than standard prenatal guidelines typically suggest. Key recommendations from the page include:

  • 2,000 IU/day – Considered a baseline intake that begins to provide benefits for the mother. This amount is very affordable (estimated at under $15 per year).
  • 4,000 IU/day – Demonstrated in studies to yield substantial benefits during pregnancy, including fewer complications for the mother. This dose has been proven safe and more effective than lower doses in improving outcomes.
  • 6,000 IU/day – Identified as an optimal level for maximizing health benefits for both mother and baby. Importantly, ~6,000 IU daily is needed for breastfeeding mothers to ensure their breast milk contains enough vitamin D for the infant (if the baby isn’t receiving vitamin D drops separately).

These suggested intake levels greatly exceed many current official recommendations but are supported by research on pregnancy outcomes. The page notes that taking above ~2,000 IU/day may slightly increase costs (mainly due to adding cofactors—other nutrients that support vitamin D’s effects). It advises that women using higher doses ensure they get those cofactors (e.g. magnesium, vitamin K₂, etc.) and not too much calcium (keep supplemental calcium < 750 mg/day) for optimal balance. It’s also suggested to test vitamin D blood levels in high-risk pregnant women about 6 weeks after starting supplementation to confirm they’ve reached adequate levels.

Health Benefits for Mothers
Adequate vitamin D during pregnancy has been linked to a wide range of maternal health benefits. The page highlights research showing that mothers with higher vitamin D levels or supplementation have:

  • Reduced risk of pregnancy complications: Higher vitamin D is associated with significantly lower rates of preeclampsia (high blood pressure in pregnancy) and gestational diabetes. For example, women taking around 4,000 IU daily had far lower odds of developing preeclampsia, and vitamin D supplementation has been shown to cut gestational diabetes incidence by roughly 30–60% in multiple studies. Sufficient vitamin D also correlates with fewer infections during pregnancy (such as bacterial vaginosis) and better immune function.
  • Lower chance of cesarean section: Vitamin D sufficiency appears to reduce the likelihood of needing a C-section. One summary on the page noted that women with higher vitamin D had about 4 times fewer unplanned Cesarean deliveries compared to those with low levels.
  • Improved fertility and lower miscarriage risk: The overview cites evidence that adequate vitamin D helps with conception and maintaining pregnancy. Women with good vitamin D status were less likely to experience infertility issues or early miscarriages (one observational finding was a 2.5-fold reduction in miscarriage rates with higher vitamin D).
  • Better maternal health and wellness: Sufficient vitamin D supports the mother’s overall health. It contributes to stronger bones for the mother (preventing the loss of bone density during pregnancy), and even dental health appears better – one study listed found women taking ~2,000 IU had half the dental problems during pregnancy. Some evidence suggests vitamin D may improve sleep quality in the second trimester and reduce the risk of postpartum depression. In one trial, women given vitamin D had about a 40% lower rate of postnatal depression.

Health Benefits for Infants and Children
Getting enough vitamin D during pregnancy doesn’t just benefit the mother – it has lasting impacts on the baby’s health as well. The VitaminDWiki page outlines numerous benefits for infants and children when the mother’s vitamin D status is high:

  • Higher birth weight and full-term births: Mothers with ample vitamin D are less likely to have preterm or low-birth-weight babies. Studies in the review showed that sufficient vitamin D intake (e.g. 2,000 IU in a trial in India) led to fewer premature births, higher newborn weights, and even better APGAR scores at birth. Conversely, low maternal vitamin D was linked to a higher chance of preterm labor. (One cited study found that having vitamin D < 20 ng/mL made preterm delivery about 3 times more likely, and another noted a 7-fold higher risk of low-birth-weight babies when the mother was very deficient.) Ensuring adequate vitamin D through pregnancy appears to support carrying to term and delivering a healthier-weight infant.
  • Lower risk of childhood illnesses: Maternal vitamin D sufficiency has been associated with reduced risks of various childhood conditions. For example, taking around 4,400 IU/day during pregnancy was found to cut the risk of asthma or wheezing in the child by about 50%. Adequate prenatal vitamin D also resulted in fewer childhood respiratory infections and ear infections, as vitamin D supports the developing immune system. There is evidence that children born to vitamin D–replete mothers have a lower chance of developing allergies (one trial showed a 5-fold reduction in dust-mite allergy in kids when moms supplemented). Additionally, infants whose mothers had high vitamin D had a much lower incidence of infantile rickets and better bone development.
  • Neurodevelopment and long-term outcomes: The vitamin D status of the mother can influence the child’s brain development and long-term health. Research summarized on the page found that children of mothers with higher vitamin D scored better on tests of language and motor skill development in early childhood. For instance, one study noted 2× fewer language delays by age 5 when moms took adequate vitamin D. There are also indications that sufficient prenatal vitamin D might reduce the risk of autism in the child (especially in families with a history) – one intervention reported a 4-fold reduction in autism in subsequent siblings when high-dose vitamin D was given to pregnant mothers and infants. Moreover, an intriguing association is noted between maternal vitamin D and the child’s risk for multiple sclerosis or other autoimmune diseases decades later. Ensuring the mother has healthy vitamin D levels during pregnancy could impart long-term protective effects for the offspring.

Scientific Studies and Evidence
The webpage backs up these benefits with a large collection of scientific studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and meta-analyses. In total, dozens of studies are referenced, and their findings converge on the conclusion that vitamin D is crucial for a healthy pregnancy. Some notable research highlights include:

  • Safe and effective high-dose trials: Multiple RCTs led by vitamin D researchers (such as Dr. Bruce Hollis and Dr. Carol Wagner) have tested daily doses like 4,000 IU and even higher, finding significant benefits with no safety issues. A landmark trial showed that 4,000 IU/day for pregnant women was safe and more effective than 400 IU or 2,000 IU in achieving sufficient blood levels and improving outcomes. Follow-up studies and others in different populations (including a 2023 Mongolian RCT) have consistently reported that ~4,000 IU daily optimizes maternal and neonatal vitamin D status and reduces complications. A 2020 study demonstrated that 6,400 IU/day postpartum (for breastfeeding mothers) safely raised both mom and baby’s vitamin D. These high-dose regimens have not shown adverse effects and are increasingly considered both safe and necessary to reach target vitamin D levels (usually around 40–50 ng/mL) for health.
  • Reduced preterm birth and complications: An important 2017 trial (GrassrootsHealth cohort analysis) found that raising pregnant women’s vitamin D levels was associated with dramatically lower preterm birth rates – up to 50-70% reduction in preterm births for women who achieved around 40 ng/mL vs those around 20 ng/mL. Similarly, a 2018 randomized trial reported a 7-fold drop in preeclampsia rates in the high-dose vitamin D group (~4,000 IU/day) compared to controls. Many other intervention studies summarized on the page echo these findings: vitamin D supplementation tends to lower the incidence of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and infections. Even recurrence of preeclampsia in high-risk women was cut in half in a trial using 50,000 IU every two weeks. In contrast, trials using low doses (like 800 IU/day or 1,000 IU/day) often showed minimal improvement, underlining that dose matters – effective results often require several thousand IU daily.
  • Infant and childhood health trials: Research extending to infants after birth supports maternal vitamin D supplementation benefits. For example, one RCT (published in 2016) gave pregnant women 5,000 IU/day and their newborns 1,000 IU/day, and observed a fourfold reduction in autism in later offspring of families at risk. Other trials indicated that infants whose mothers took high vitamin D or who were given vitamin D supplements themselves had stronger immunity (fewer wheezing illnesses) and needed fewer antibiotics in their first year. On the other hand, infants who received only the standard 400 IU had relatively modest increases in blood levels, whereas higher doses led to optimal vitamin D status (one study showed infants needed around 1,600 IU daily to achieve healthy levels).
  • Meta-analyses and reviews: The page references systematic reviews that compile data from many studies. A 2012 meta-analysis cited found that low maternal vitamin D was significantly associated with various problems, including a 60% higher risk of having a low-birth-weight baby. Reviews in 2013 concluded that about 4,000 IU daily is an optimal and safe dose in pregnancy, and highlighted that many groups of pregnant women (such as those with darker skin, living in northern latitudes, or with limited sun exposure) are at particularly high risk for deficiency. The consensus emerging from the scientific literature is that current standard prenatal vitamin D recommendations (often just 400–600 IU) are far too low to achieve the blood levels needed for these health benefits.

The breadth of studies compiled on the page shows consistent trends: Vitamin D sufficiency leads to healthier pregnancies and babies. Many of the positive findings (fewer preterm births, less asthma in children, etc.) were observed specifically when mothers attained serum 25(OH)D levels around 40–50 ng/mL, which typically requires supplementation in the thousands of IU. In contrast, vitamin D inadequacy is common and associated with poorer outcomes.
Vitamin D Deficiency in Pregnancy
One of the striking points made is how widespread vitamin D deficiency is among pregnant women worldwide, even in sunny regions. Several studies are mentioned that illustrate this problem:

  • In a study of pregnant women in South Carolina (32°N latitude, a sun-rich environment), 48% of women were outright deficient (<20 ng/mL) and an additional 37% had insufficient levels (<32 ng/mL) at their first prenatal visit. African American women had the lowest levels – in that study, 94% of Black mothers had insufficient vitamin D. This highlights that lifestyle, skin pigmentation, and other factors can lead to deficiency even where sunlight is abundant.
  • In the United States, overall vitamin D status in women of childbearing age is poor. CDC data (from around 2010) showed roughly 1 in 3 American women have levels below 20 ng/mL. The prevalence is even higher in certain groups: among women with less than a high school education it was ~55%, and among Black women it was about 78% who were below 20 ng/mL. This deficiency epidemic contributes to racial and socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcomes (for example, the page notes the higher preterm birth rate in U.S. Black women – about 17% vs 11% in white women – which could be partly linked to lower vitamin D).
  • Deficiency is extremely common in regions with less sun or cultural practices of covering skin. Cited figures include 80% of South Asian women in the UK having vitamin D levels under 10 ng/mL in winter, and around 90% of pregnant women in India (and their newborn infants) under 20 ng/mL. In some developing countries, severe deficiencies (<5 ng/mL) are seen in children. Such low levels contribute to health problems like rickets in infants and osteomalacia in mothers.
  • The page also mentions that in 62 out of 65 countries analyzed, preterm birth rates have been rising, and it implies vitamin D deficiency may be a contributing factor. For instance, one note suggests that in very hot climates with high UV (like parts of the US South or Middle East), people stay indoors (often in air conditioning) to avoid the heat, but this also means they avoid sun exposure and can become deficient despite the sunlight available. This could paradoxically lead to higher rates of preterm birth in those high-UV regions due to low vitamin D.

These findings collectively raise concern that current nutritional guidelines are not preventing deficiency in pregnant women. The page essentially argues that improving vitamin D status on a population level could reduce many of these adverse outcomes and should be a public health priority.
Vitamin D Supplementation for Infants
Another aspect the webpage covers is vitamin D in infants – both how much infants need and how maternal vitamin D impacts the baby after birth. Key points include:

  • Standard infant recommendations: In the US, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends 400 IU/day of vitamin D for infants (particularly breastfed infants, since breast milk normally contains little vitamin D unless the mother supplements heavily). Many infants, however, do not even receive this amount. The page notes fewer than 40% of infants actually get the advised 400 IU. In fact, a 2010 study found many children did not even get 200 IU per day from all sources, and essentially no children in that cohort exceeded 480 IU/day intake. This indicates poor adherence and possibly the need for alternative strategies to ensure infants get enough vitamin D.
  • Higher needs for infants: Emerging research suggests 400 IU might be too low for optimal infant health. A 2013 JAMA randomized trial found that infants may require around 1,600 IU daily to achieve vitamin D blood levels in the desired range. Other countries sometimes recommend more than 400 IU; for example, Poland has recommended about 100 IU of vitamin D per kilogram of body weight for infants (so a 5 kg baby would get 500 IU). France’s pediatric society even suggested that breastfed infants receive 1,000–1,200 IU/day. These higher infant doses have been used and were well-tolerated, resulting in better vitamin D status (some German infants given 250 IU/day reached robust levels around 56 ng/mL, and those given 500 IU/day reached ~60 ng/mL without issues). Importantly, one long-term Finnish study showed that infants supplemented with 2,000 IU/day not only grew to normal height but also had a dramatically lower incidence of type 1 diabetes as they got older, with no adverse effects – highlighting potential lifelong benefits of higher vitamin D in infancy.
  • Maternal vs infant supplementation: There are two ways to ensure an infant gets enough vitamin D – either give the infant drops directly or have the breastfeeding mother take a high enough dose that her milk is enriched with vitamin D. Research supports the latter approach: if a lactating mother takes about 6,000 IU/day, her breast milk will contain ample vitamin D to meet the baby’s needs (equivalent to the baby getting 400–800 IU or more just from nursing). This was demonstrated in an RCT where 6,400 IU to mothers was as effective as giving 300 IU to the baby directly. This approach can be easier for families (avoiding the need for infant drops) but it relies on the mother’s compliance with a higher dose. The page does caution against certain practices like extremely infrequent large dosing for infants; one study tried giving infants 50,000 IU every two months (which averages ~833 IU/day) and noted that such a long interval between doses is not ideal for maintaining steady levels. Regular daily dosing (for infant or mother) is preferable.
  • Preventing rickets and bone issues: Ensuring infants get enough vitamin D is critical to prevent rickets, a disease of bone weakening. The category “Rickets/Battered Child/Weak bones” is mentioned, pointing out that infants with severe vitamin D deficiency can present with bone fractures that mimic signs of child abuse. In fact, some cases of suspected abuse have turned out to be undiagnosed rickets. Proper vitamin D supplementation of infants (or high-dose supplementation of the mother while breastfeeding) can prevent rickets entirely. Historically, some countries provided very high doses to infants to curb rickets – the page notes Finland once recommended a dose about 20× higher than the current US standard (likely an older practice of a few thousand IU daily) to ensure babies had enough. While that level is no longer used, it underlines the safety margin of vitamin D in infants when monitored, and that the pendulum has perhaps swung too far to low dosing in recent decades.

Global Guidelines and Calls to Action
The overview also touches on how different health organizations and countries handle vitamin D in pregnancy, often highlighting a mismatch between research findings and official recommendations:

  • In the UK, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists as of 2012 was still recommending only 400 IU/day for pregnant women – a level the page calls “amazingly low” given the evidence for higher doses. Many experts consider such low dosing insufficient to prevent deficiency.
  • France takes a different approach: the French Pediatric Society’s guideline (2012) for pregnant women was to give a single oral dose of 80,000–100,000 IU vitamin D at the beginning of the 7th month of pregnancy. This is essentially a one-time high-dose “loading” strategy. VitaminDWiki’s commentary on this is that giving that much all at once is “too much all at once” – implying a preference for spreading the dose – but it illustrates that some national guidelines do acknowledge the need for higher total vitamin D intake during pregnancy (just delivered in a bolus form).
  • Researchers like Dr. Michael Holick have called for action to increase vitamin D intake in pregnancy. A 2019 “call to action” cited on the page advocates for allowing loading doses and generally raising target levels for pregnant women, given the clear benefits and safety profile. Similarly, multiple conferences and publications (including a 2013 workshop and a 2015 GrassrootsHealth analysis) have pushed for recognizing vitamin D as a key factor in reducing preterm births and other poor outcomes.
  • The compilation on VitaminDWiki also includes many “overview” papers by experts. For example, summaries of work by Hollis and Wagner from 2010–2013 consistently conclude that 4,000 IU/day is the optimal dose in pregnancy for safety and efficacy. They emphasize starting vitamin D early (even before conception, if possible) to ensure the mother enters pregnancy with a healthy vitamin D status. In fact, one section is titled “Ensure a healthy pregnancy and baby – take Vitamin D before conception”, underscoring that women trying to become pregnant (and even fathers, for sperm quality) might benefit from raising their vitamin D levels pre-pregnancy to improve fertility and pregnancy outcomes.

There is also mention of a “Vitamin D Intervention clinical trials – 75 as of July 2017” which indicates the rapidly growing scientific attention: by 2017 there were at least 75 clinical trials investigating vitamin D in pregnancy. This number has likely grown, reflecting global interest in resolving optimal dosing and confirming all the benefits. The overall direction of these efforts is to incorporate the research findings into standard care – increasing recommended vitamin D supplementation for pregnant women and infants to improve health outcomes.
In conclusion, the VitaminDWiki overview of pregnancy and vitamin D presents compelling evidence that maintaining high vitamin D status is essential for maternal health, successful pregnancy, and the child’s development. Key takeaways are that most pregnant women are not getting enough vitamin D under current guidelines, and this deficiency is linked to higher risks of complications and suboptimal infant health. By contrast, supplementation with adequate doses (on the order of thousands of IU per day) dramatically improves outcomes – reducing preterm births, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, infections, and ensuring infants develop strong bones and healthy immune systems. The page’s summary of dozens of studies makes a strong case for revising public health recommendations to encourage higher vitamin D intake before, during, and after pregnancy for the benefit of both mothers and their children.


Pregnancy category listing has 936 items along with many category combinations

Vitamin D during pregnancy

IU Cumulative Benefit Blood level CofactorsCalcium $*/month
200 Better bones for mom
with 600 mg of Calcium
6 ng/ml increase Not needed No effect $0.10
400 Less Rickets (but not zero with 400 IU)
3X less adolescent Schizophrenia
Fewer child seizures
20-30 ng/ml Not needed No effect $0.20
2000 2X More likely to get pregnant naturally/IVF
2X Fewer dental problems with pregnancy
8X less diabetes
4X fewer C-sections (>37 ng)
4X less preeclampsia (40 ng vs 10 ng)
5X less child asthma
2X fewer language problems age 5
42 ng/ml Desirable < 750 mg $1
4000 2X fewer pregnancy complications
2X fewer pre-term births
49 ng/ml Should have
cofactors
< 750 mg $3
6000 Probable: larger benefits for above items
Just enough D for breastfed infant
More maternal and infant weight
Should have
cofactors
< 750 mg $4


$* assumes

  • You buy fairly |low cost vitamin D and Cofactors (more expensive if liquid and/or vegan )
  • Using a low cost size of vitamin D - such as 5,000 IU, as often as needed. (50,000 IU costs even less)
    Example: 5000 IU every other day if you only want an average of 2500 IU
  • Test vitamin D levels of only those moms who are at high risk for being vitamin D deficient
       $30 for a blood test about 6 weeks after starting vitamin D to check that high-risk mom is getting enough

Healthy pregnancies need lots of vitamin D

Most were taking 2,000 to 7,000 IU daily for >50% of pregnancy
   Click on hyperlinks for details

Problem
Vit. D
Reduces
Evidence
0. Chance of not conceiving3.4 times Observe
1. Miscarriage 2.5 times Observe
2. Pre-eclampsia 3.6 timesRCT
3. Gestational Diabetes 3 times RCT
4. Good 2nd trimester sleep quality 3.5 times Observe
5. Premature birth 2 times RCT
6. C-section - unplanned 1.6 timesObserve
     Stillbirth - OMEGA-3 4 timesRCT - Omega-3
7. Depression AFTER pregnancy 1.4 times RCT
8. Small for Gestational Age 1.6 times meta-analysis
9. Infant height, weight, head size
     within normal limits
RCT
10. Childhood Wheezing 1.3 times RCT
11. Additional child is Autistic 4 times Intervention
12.Young adult Multiple Sclerosis 1.9 timesObserve
13. Preeclampsia in young adult 3.5 timesRCT
14. Good motor skills @ age 31.4 times Observe
15. Childhood Mite allergy 5 times RCT
16. Childhood Respiratory Tract visits 2.5 times RCT

RCT = Randomized Controlled Trial
click here for details


Ensure a healthy pregnancy and baby - take Vitamin D before conception

has the following
Start Vitamin D soon if pregnant VDW 9923
click on chart for details


62 Studies of Pregnancy AND Intervention in VitaminDWiki

This count and list are automatically updated


6 Studies of Pregnancy AND Loading Dose in VitaminDWiki

This count and list are automatically updated


Pregnancy - general

Vitamin D levels needed  at is.gd/neonate_vitD

Image


Pregnancy problems vs Vitamin D level - GrassrootsHealth Feb 2015

Recharted by VitaminDWiki Feb 2017
Pregnancy problems reduced GRH 2015
Original
Pregnancy GrassrootsHealth 2/15
Legend:
All percentages reference a common reference level of 25.0 ng/ml as shown on the chart. %’s reflect the disease prevention % at the beginning and ending of available data.
Example: Gestational diabetes incidence is reduced by 11% when the serum level is 30.7 ng/ml vs the reference level of 25.0 ng/ml. There is a 33% reduction in incidence when the serum level is 41.9 ng/ml vs the reference level of 25.0 ng/ml.
References:

  • (Preterm Birth (1): Wagner CL, et al. 17th Workshop on Vitamin D; 2014 June 17-20.
    Preterm Birth (2): Bodnar LM, et al. Obstetrics & Gynecology; 2015.
  • Hypertensive Pregnancy Disorders, Gestational Diabetes, and Bacterial Vaginosis: Wagner CL, et al. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2013;136:313-320.
  • Depression: Huang JY, et al. J Womens Health. 2014;23(7):588-95.
  • Impaired Muscle Strength: Kalliokoski P, et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(237).
  • Postpartum Depression: Gur EB, et al. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;179:110-6.
  • Small for Gestational Age: Gernand, AD, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(1):40-8.
  • Common Cold, Ear Infection, and Lung Inflammation: Shin YH, et al. Korean J Pediatr. 2013;56(10):439-445.
  • Asthma: Magnus MC, et al. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013;27(6).

Preterm and low-weight births

Image


Increased pre-term birth if black or if high UV index (stay inside - away from the hot sun)

PubMed:  24618066 April 2014


IU for infants

Low Levels among mothers and infants

Chart from Grassroots Health May 2016
Grassroots Health May 2016

see wikipage: http://www.vitamindwiki.com/tiki-index.php?page_id=2563

Preeclampsia

Infants


20X more than US standard - Wagner April 2010 slide 31
Image

Chart by Heaney,  downloaded from Grassroots April 2010 – video expected June
Fewer than 40% of infants got 400 IU of vitamin D, The amount recommended by American Academy of Pediatrics


A June 2010 study which includes the following graph, found that MANY children do not even get 200 IU

and NONE of the children got more than 480 IU
from Dietary Guidelines for Americans vitamin D - June 2010


Note: When infant stops drinking vitamin D fortified milk, be sure to supplement with vitamin D - as most fruit juice is not fortified.

Rickets/Battered Child/Weak bones


High risk of being vitamin D deficient during pregnancy

Potential high risk if : dark skin, twins, recent pregnancy, smoking, very far from equator, obese, excessive clothes,

BEFORE: Help getting pregnant - woman & man

Vitamin D increases the fertility of BOTH the woman.and the man
Each 1 ng increase in blood level of vitamin D increases clinical pregnancy by 6%
You may not have heard much about it since it has been patented
   see also Who said vitamin D could not be patented
Vitamin D has been used by zoos and vets for a long time to increase fertility


Decrease in C-sections as Vitamin D levels are increased

C-section 4X more likely if less than 20 ng of vitamin D – May 2012
Risk of Cesarean 2X higher if low vitamin D – April 2012
C-section 4X more likely when vitamin D less than 37 ng – many items
Search VitaminDWiki for cesarean 90 items as of Aug 2014


21 Depression and Pregnancy studies


Other


See also VitaminDWiki


6400 IU of vitamin D got mothers to 50+ nanograms

Image


Some Pregnancy complications if low vitamin D

From 3 to 55 X more likely to have these health problems if low Vitamin D
7 X more likely to have low birth weight infant
5 X more likely to get vaginosis during pregnancy
4 X more likely to have preeclampsia during pregnancy
4 X more likely to have C-section


Good review of prenatal Vitamins (more than just Vitamin D) - April 2024

Examine.com

  • "However, it’s important not to exceed the recommended daily intake during pregnancy, as higher doses of certain vitamins and minerals may be harmful to the fetus (e.g., iron, folic acid, zinc)"
  • "These may encompass vitamins vitamin B1, vitamin B2, B3, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, C, D, E, and K, along with folic acid, iodine, magnesium, iron, copper, zinc, selenium, and sometimes additional components like omega-3."

See also web

  • Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System CDC
    Image
  • Clinical Trials for Pregnacy with vitamin D INTERVENTION 75 as of July 2017
  • Pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of vitamin D3 (70,000 IU) in pregnant and non-pregnant women Dec 2012
    PDF is attached at the bottom of this page
  • Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy: Is It Necessary? Medscape Sept 2013
    Nope maternal 25(OH)D levels in any trimester failed to significantly affect the bone-mineral content of offspring
    They fail to consider anything other than bone content at age 10!!
  • Google Sites on Vitamin D and pregnancy Oct 2013 included links to the following
    Vitamin D may be useful as immunotherapy in treatment of recurrent miscarriage
    Vitamin D reduces inflammation associated with miscarriage
    4000 IU Vitamin D daily lowers rates of infection, preterm labor and preterm birth
    Vitamin D required for fetal development; deficiency causes preeclampsia, gestational diabetes
    Vitamin D levels not associated with fertility or pregnancy outcome except late miscarriage
    Plasma vitamin D concentrations may affect pregnancy outcomes.
    Low vitamin D leads to failed IVF attempts
    Having sufficient vitamin D levels is associated with 4 times higher success rate in IVF
    93% of infertile women were low in vitamin D
    High or low vitamin D associated with lower sperm count, motility and morphology
    High vitamin D levels associated with higher sperm motility and morphology
    Extra vitamin D increases litter size in pigs and has a trend toward higher pregnancy rates
    Vitamin D deficiency leads to fewer offspring in mice
    Vitamin D deficiency impairs egg production, elevates LH and FSH
    Vitamin D stimulates estrogen and progesterone production by the placenta
    Vitamin D stimulates progesterone and estrogen production in the ovary
    Excess Vitamin D reduces the function of the corpus luteum and decreases progesterone
  • Effect of Vitamin D Levels on Intrapartum Epidural Consumption Oct 2014 presentation
    12 mg of Epidural for average vitamin D = 41 ng,
    18 mg of Epidural for average vitamin D = 26 ng
    Much less pain among the 93 women who had high levels of vitamin D.
    Note that scheduled cesareans were excluded from the analysis

Placenta

The Placenta, an Afterthought No Longer New York Times Dec 2018

  • "An ephemeral organ, long dismissed merely as afterbirth, increasingly is viewed as critical to understanding the health and course of pregnancy."
  • "Ninety percent of the placenta is made up of cells not from the mother but from the fetus."
  • "As the placental beachhead grows, its cells specialize to do the work of heart, lungs, liver and kidneys until the fetus can fend for itself. Groups of cells exchange oxygen for carbon dioxide; provide nutrients and hormones; protect the fetus from harmful stress, germs and chemicals; and remove waste"
  • "Male fetuses typically are larger than females throughout gestation, but they also have higher rates of spontaneous abortions, stillbirth, premature birth and neurodevelopmental conditions."

Human Placenta Project
Previously had studied placenta after birth.
Now studying the placenta as early as 1st trimester - to detect and hopefully avoid problems

Short url = http://is.gd/dpregnancy

Overview Pregnancy and vitamin D        
159397 visitors, last modified 28 Feb, 2025,
(Cached) Printer Friendly Follow this page for updates

Attached files

ID Name Comment Uploaded Size Downloads
10959 The Placenta, an Afterthought No Longer - The New York Times.pdf admin 03 Dec, 2018 547.96 Kb 1135
10671 Pregnancy related mortality - CDC.jpg admin 13 Oct, 2018 38.32 Kb 3415
3437 Preterm birth 10 percent WHO 2009.pdf admin 23 Dec, 2013 439.61 Kb 2643
2994 70,000 IU.pdf admin 13 Sep, 2013 479.99 Kb 2553
264 Vitamin D preconception to birth - 2010.gif admin 26 Oct, 2010 9.17 Kb 5227
194 Knox on breastfeeding - 2010.gif admin 27 Sep, 2010 18.51 Kb 7873
193 Gum pockets vs vitamin D Hollis slides 2010 - 28.gif admin 26 Sep, 2010 15.53 Kb 4960
192 Finland vitamin D for infants - Wagner 2010 pg 31.gif admin 26 Sep, 2010 11.25 Kb 18368
191 6400 vs 400 IU during pregnancy - Wagner April 2010 pg 84.gif admin 26 Sep, 2010 12.28 Kb 23879
190 2000 and 4000 IU during pregnancy - Wagner April 2010 pg 51.gif admin 26 Sep, 2010 25.84 Kb 2718