Let 1000 die from vitamin D deficiency rather than incur 1 lawsuit

In general, good actions which

• help lots of people are not rewarded,
• hurt even a tiny number of people will result in lawsuits by those hurt
• decrease the size/power of an establishment are rejected by that establishment

Example of a good action: Increase vitamin D

• Will prevent many people from suffering/dying of many diseases in the column at the left
• Might cause suffering/death to rare individuals
• Could decrease the size of the medical establishment

Increasing the vitamin D levels of a country will result in:

• Saving thousands of peoples lives or reduce their reduce their suffering
• Cause suffering and in rare cases death of a few people
  Doctors, organizations might incur lawsuits
• Also - reduced business for doctors
  Example: In 2012 a doctor went out of business after getting all of his patients vitamin D levels to 80 ng
  Average visit per patient dropped from 4 per year down to 1
  The high level of vitamin D was great for his patients, lousy for his business
  Vitamin D would also reduce business for labs, clinics, drug manufacturers, pharmacists, etc.

Notes:

1. Vitamin D should be great for Health Maintence Organizations (HMOs)
   HMOs will continue to get income, but will have far fewer expenses
2. Potential of lawsuits if vitamin D is not increased by your doctor
   Increased liability exposure
3. Vitamin D fortification is especially hard for people which can have problems with extra vitamin D
   Increasing increase vitamin D back to where it had been 40 years before can cause problems

See also VitaminDWiki

• COVID-19 and Vitamin D: Health Authorities do not understand risk-reward – Nov 2020
• A look at inner workings of committee looking at vitamin D for UK - Dec 2012
• Proof that Vitamin D Works 68 health problems PROVEN to be helped (Feb 2016)
• Overview Rare Allergic reaction to vitamin D about 1 in 300 – no deaths
  Reaction probably due to lack of Magnesium
• All items in category Interactions 125 items (virtually all interactions = Drug reduces the vitamin D effectivity, no reaction
• Should people at high risk for vitamin D deficiency wait 5 years -Feb 2013
  They may be trying for a risk/reward ratio of about 1 in 1,000: similar to the title of this page
• More than half of the top richest US lobbys are Health related all lobbyists are opposed to size reductions
  American Medical Association, American Hospital Association, Big Pharma are 3 of the 6 biggest spending lobbiests in the US
• Dr. Grant on vitamin D and mortality in VitaminDWiki
• 17 reasons why are doctors reluctant to accept vitamin D
• Wonder when the first doctor will be found liable for not providing vitamin D to a patient
• Would you be opposed to my getting more vitamin D? a question to your doctor that minimizes his risk