Tanning Lotions Actually Decrease Vitamin D Production
The Counterintuitive Reality: Tanning Lotions Decrease Vitamin D Production
Contrary to what might be expected, suntan lotions and oils like coconut oil do not increase vitamin D generation in the skin. In fact, they have the opposite effect through multiple mechanisms that ultimately reduce vitamin D synthesis.
How Tanning Oils Work
Tanning oils accelerate the darkening of skin through two primary mechanisms:[1][2]
- Enhanced UV penetration: The oils create a reflective layer on the skin surface that attracts and helps UV rays penetrate more efficiently into the epidermis where melanocytes reside
- Melanin production stimulation: Many tanning products contain ingredients like L-Tyrosine (an amino acid precursor to melanin), beta-carotene, and other compounds that provide melanocytes with building blocks to produce melanin more rapidly
While these mechanisms do accelerate tanning—the visible darkening of skin—they simultaneously reduce the skin's ability to produce vitamin D.
The Vitamin D Production Problem
The fundamental issue lies in understanding what produces vitamin D versus what produces a tan. Both processes require UVB radiation (290-320 nm wavelength), but they have an inverse relationship:[3][4]
UVB radiation converts 7-dehydrocholesterol in the skin into previtamin D₃, which then converts to vitamin D₃. However, melanin—the pigment responsible for tanning—absorbs and scatters UVB radiation. This absorption protects deeper skin layers from UV damage but simultaneously blocks the UVB photons needed for vitamin D synthesis.[5][3]
Quantifying the Reduction
Research reveals several quantifiable effects:
1. Coconut Oil's Minimal UV Protection
Coconut oil, a common tanning oil ingredient, has an SPF of only 4-8. Studies show it blocks approximately 20% of UV radiation. While this seems minimal, any UV blocking reduces vitamin D synthesis. More importantly, coconut oil's low SPF means it allows substantial UV exposure that triggers melanin production—and that melanin then becomes the primary barrier to vitamin D synthesis.[6][7][8][9][10][11]
2. The Tan Itself Blocks Vitamin D
Once skin becomes tanned, it provides an SPF of approximately 2-4. Using the SPF formula where protection = (SPF-1)/SPF × 100%, we can calculate:[12][13][14]
- SPF 2 blocks 50% of UVB rays[15][16]
- SPF 3 blocks approximately 67% of UVB rays
- SPF 4 blocks 75% of UVB rays[16]
Since a tan typically provides SPF 3-4, tanned skin blocks approximately 65-75% of the UVB radiation necessary for vitamin D synthesis. The research explicitly states that "only approximately 65% of the erythema induced by UV radiation is blocked" by an SPF 3-4 tan, meaning 65% of vitamin D-producing UVB is also blocked.[13]
3. Progressive Melanin Accumulation
The effect compounds over time. A landmark Brazilian study examined 986 individuals living at 8 degrees south of the equator with extensive daily sun exposure and found that 72% were vitamin D deficient. The researchers concluded that "skin tanning, which is a natural protection against the harmful effects of UV irradiation, limits the progressive rise in serum vitamin D". As one researcher stated: "tan skin may provide some protection against the sun's harmful ultraviolet (UV) rays, but this increase in pigment blocks vitamin D synthesis".[17][18][19]
The Mechanism: Melanin as a Competitive Absorber
Melanin and 7-dehydrocholesterol (the vitamin D precursor) both compete for the same UVB photons. When tanning accelerators stimulate melanin production:[4][20]
- More melanin accumulates in the basal and suprabasal layers of the epidermis
- This melanin absorbs UVB photons before they can reach 7-dehydrocholesterol molecules
- The result is reduced efficiency of vitamin D synthesis per unit of UVB exposure
Studies comparing light and dark skin demonstrate this principle dramatically. When light skin and dark skin samples were exposed to identical sunlight in Boston, light skin converted 3% of cutaneous 7-dehydrocholesterol into previtamin D₃ after 30 minutes, whereas darker skin converted only 0.3%—a 10-fold difference.[21]
Why Tanning Users May Have Higher Vitamin D Despite Lower Efficiency
One apparent paradox deserves clarification: studies show that regular tanning bed users have vitamin D levels 90% higher than non-tanners. However, this reflects total UV exposure time, not efficiency. Tanners achieve higher vitamin D levels by exposing nearly 100% of their body surface to UV radiation for extended periods, compensating for their reduced synthesis efficiency through sheer exposure volume.[22][23][24]
When researchers controlled for total UV dose and measured synthesis efficiency, tanned skin consistently produced less vitamin D per unit of UVB exposure.[25][17][21]
The Bottom Line: A 50-75% Reduction
To directly answer your question: Tanning lotions do not increase vitamin D generation—they decrease it by approximately 50-75% once the tan develops. The initial application of coconut oil with its SPF 4-8 may block 20-50% of UVB, but the accelerated melanin production triggered by enhanced UV penetration creates a more substantial long-term barrier of 65-75% blockage.[6][13][16]
This represents a profound reduction in vitamin D synthesis efficiency. Where unprotected, untanned skin might produce sufficient vitamin D from 10-15 minutes of midday sun exposure, tanned skin would require 3-4 times longer exposure to produce the same amount.
Practical Implications
For individuals concerned about vitamin D status:
- Tanning oils work against vitamin D production by accelerating melanin accumulation
- The darker the tan, the greater the vitamin D synthesis impairment
- Supplementation becomes more important for those who regularly tan or have naturally darker skin[26][27]
- The evolutionary logic is clear: human skin depigmented as populations migrated to northern latitudes specifically to maintain adequate vitamin D synthesis in lower-UVB environments[28][29][4]
The vitamin D-folate hypothesis in evolutionary biology proposes that skin pigmentation represents a compromise: dark enough in high-UV regions to prevent folate degradation, yet light enough in low-UV regions to permit adequate vitamin D synthesis. Artificially increasing pigmentation through tanning disrupts this balance.[4][28]
Clck HERE to see details of references, including charts
Compact list of references
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132
Related in VitaminDWiki
- Tanning: Worshipped for millennia, demonized by Dermatologists for 40 years, is coming back
- Use of tanning beds would reduce associated deaths by 10X
- Overview Suntan, melanoma and vitamin D
- Sun replacement = Vitamin D (need 60 to 100 ng) - video
- Seniors get about 4X less vitamin D from the sun or UVB
- 340,000 US deaths annually due to insufficient sun (some due to low vitamin D)
- Avoiding the sun may be as bad as smoking - many studies
- Does Less Sun mean More Disease 5 minute video by VitaminDWiki