Cochrane review of Vitamin D and stunting will be ignoring 9 important concerns
The effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and non-communicable diseases among infants and children younger than five years of age
Extensive description of how the review of Randomized controlled trials will be conducted
Important concerns that they appear to be ignoring
Vitamin D taken during pregnancy
Type of vitamin D given
- Infants will reject Vitamin D oils which they cannot digest
- There are many other forms of vitamin, such as gut friendly and topical
Cofactors which are known to improve growth – such as Magnesium and Omega-3
How soon after birth were supplements started
- Day zero, day 10, month 1, month 12 . . .
Extra vitamin D needed if infant is a preemie, unhealthy, etc,
Does the dose size vary with infant weight
Was the mother breastfeeding, and if so, was she supplementing
If using formula, was the formula fortified - was the formula low fat (2.5 X less vitamin D gets into the infant)
The vitamin D level achieved by the infant
- They appear to be only looking at dosing, and ignoring response to the dose
Skin color of the infant - dark skin infants often need much larger doses
Was the infant given enough time in the noon-day sun to generate Vitamin D (> 30 minutes a week)
Was Calcium also given
Will they be accounting for deaths in the non-supplemented infants?
Will they include RCTs with loading doses, injections, monthly doses, etc?
See also VitaminDWiki
Obese children and youths need more vitamin D – Review Feb 2015
Low Vitamin D in infants - video interview of Dr. Holick - May 2017
Rickets needs Vitamin D and Calcium - Global Consensus Jan 2016
Rickets in Norway – 93 percent had darker skin (lower vitamin D) – May 2017
NAFLD in children nicely treated by combination of Vitamin D and Omega-3 – RCT Dec 2016
Cochrane Reviews might be influenced by big Pharma – 5 board members leave in 1 day – Sept 2018