Loading...
 
Register Log In Login with facebook

Prostate cancer risk increase with Vitamin D (other studies disagree) – meta-analysis Jan 2018

Circulating vitamin D concentration and risk of prostate cancer: a dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 9 January 2018 Vol 2018:14 Pages 95—104, DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S149325
Gao JL, Wei W, Wang G, Zhou HL, Fu YW, Liu N
Department of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, People’s Republic of China

 

 Download the PDF from VitaminDWiki

Risk for all studies (not adjusted for excess Calcium)

Image

Background: Though many studies have been performed to elucidate the association between circulating vitamin D and prostate cancer, no conclusive result is available. We carried out a dose–response meta-analysis to quantitatively examine the association of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentration with prostate cancer.

Methods: Only prospective studies examining the associations of circulating 25[OH]D concentration with prostate cancer were eligible for the meta-analysis. A random-effect meta-analysis was done first, to calculate the summary relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the higher concentration with the lower concentration of 25[OH]D. A dose–response meta-analysis using random-effects model was then carried out to evaluate the nonlinearity and calculate the summary RR caused per 10 ng/mL increment.

Results: Nineteen prospective cohort or nested case–control studies were included. Higher 25[OH]D concentration was significantly correlated with elevated risk of prostate cancer (RR =1.15, 95% CI 1.06–1.24). No nonlinear relationship was found between 25[OH]D concentration and risk of prostate cancer (P=0.654). Dose–response meta-analysis showed that the summary RR caused per 10 ng/mL increment in circulating 25[OH]D concentration was 1.04 (95% CI 1.02–1.06). Subgroup analysis also found a modest dose–response relationship. Funnel plot and Egger’s test did not detect publication bias.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that highest 25[OH]D concentration is correlated with elevated risk of prostate cancer and a modest dose–response effect exists in this association; however, more studies are needed.

Created by admin. Last Modification: Friday February 23, 2018 15:56:33 UTC by admin. (Version 9)

Attached files

ID Name Comment Uploaded Size Downloads
9164 Prostate Cancer vs D.jpg admin 11 Jan, 2018 20:03 32.89 Kb 227
9163 Prostate meta-analysis.pdf PDF 2018 admin 11 Jan, 2018 20:02 952.47 Kb 91
See any problem with this page? Report it (FINALLY WORKS)