Toggle Health Problems and D

Vitamin D3 much better than D2 for loading doses– meta-analysis May 2012

Comparison of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1,2,3

Laura Tripkovic, Helen Lambert, Kathryn Hart, Colin P Smith, Giselda Bucca, Simon Penson, Gemma Chope, Elina Hyppönen, Jacqueline Berry, Reinhold Vieth, and Susan Lanham-New
1 From the Departments of Nutrition and Metabolism (LT, HL, SL-N, and KH) and Microbial and Cellular Sciences (CPS and GB), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom; Campden BRI, Chipping Campden, United Kingdom (SP and GC); the Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom (EH); the Vitamin D Research Group, Department of Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (JB); and the Departments of Nutritional Sciences and Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (RV).
2 Supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) as part of the BBSRC Diet and Health Research Industry Club (grant BB/I006192/1).
3 Address reprint requests and correspondence to L Tripkovic, Department of Nutrition and Metabolism, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH. E-mail: laura.tripkovic at surrey.ac.uk.

Background: Currently, there is a lack of clarity in the literature as to whether there is a definitive difference between the effects of vitamins D2 and D3 in the raising of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D].

Objective: The objective of this article was to report a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have directly compared the effects of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 on serum 25(OH)D concentrations in humans.

Design: The ISI Web of Knowledge (January 1966 to July 2011) database was searched electronically for all relevant studies in adults that directly compared vitamin D3 with vitamin D2. The Cochrane Clinical Trials Registry, International Standard Randomized Controlled Trials Number register, and clinicaltrials.gov were also searched for any unpublished trials.

Results: A meta-analysis of RCTs indicated that supplementation with vitamin D3 had a significant and positive effect in the raising of serum 25(OH)D concentrations compared with the effect of vitamin D2 (P = 0.001). When the frequency of dosage administration was compared, there was a significant response for vitamin D3 when given as a bolus dose (P = 0.0002) compared with administration of vitamin D2, but the effect was lost with daily supplementation.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicates that vitamin D3 is more efficacious at raising serum 25(OH)D concentrations than is vitamin D2, and thus vitamin D3 could potentially become the preferred choice for supplementation. However, additional research is required to examine the metabolic pathways involved in oral and intramuscular administration of vitamin D and the effects across age, sex, and ethnicity, which this review was unable to verify.

Received November 18, 2011, Accepted February 29, 2012.

D3 is 34% better than D2 when doses are given infrequently


D3 is 5% better than D2 when doses are given daily


PDF is attached at bottom of this page
- - - - - - - - - - - -

See also VitaminDWiki

Attached files

ID Name Comment Uploaded Size Downloads
1294 D2 D3 daily.jpg admin 03 May, 2012 11:57 6.56 Kb 1233
1293 D2 D3 infrequent.jpg admin 03 May, 2012 11:57 6.50 Kb 1204
1292 D3 D2 mata-analysis May 2012.pdf PDF admin 03 May, 2012 11:49 424.30 Kb 816