Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6;(7):CD007470.
Bjelakovic G, Gluud LL, Nikolova D, Whitfield K, Wetterslev J, Simonetti RG, Bjelakovic M, Gluud C.
Department of Internal Medicine - Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical Faculty, University of Nis, Zorana Djindjica 81, Nis, Serbia, 18000.
BACKGROUND: The available evidence on vitamin D and mortality is inconclusive.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of vitamin D for prevention of mortality in adults.
SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, the Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (to January 2011). We scanned bibliographies of relevant publications and asked experts and pharmaceutical companies for additional trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials that compared vitamin D at any dose, duration, and route of administration versus placebo or no intervention. Vitamin D could have been administered as supplemental
vitamin D (vitamin D(3) (cholecalciferol) or
- vitamin D(2) (ergocalciferol)) or an
- active form of vitamin D (1?-hydroxyvitamin D (alfacalcidol) or
- 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (calcitriol)).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Six authors extracted data independently. Random-effects and fixed-effect model meta-analyses were conducted. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated the risk ratios (RR). To account for trials with zero events, meta-analyses of dichotomous data were repeated using risk differences (RD) and empirical continuity corrections. Risk of bias was considered in order to minimise risk of systematic errors. Trial sequential analyses were conducted to minimise the risk of random errors.
MAIN RESULTS: Fifty randomised trials with 94,148 participants provided data for the mortality analyses. Most trials included elderly women (older than 70 years).
Vitamin D was administered for a median of two years. More than one half of the trials had a low risk of bias.
Overall, vitamin D decreased mortality (RR 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 1.00, I(2) = 0%).
When the different forms of vitamin D were assessed separately,
- only vitamin D(3) decreased mortality significantly (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.98, I(2) = 0%; 74,789 participants, 32 trials) whereas
- vitamin D(2), alfacalcidol, or calcitriol did not.
Trial sequential analysis supported our finding regarding vitamin D(3), corresponding to 161 individuals treated to prevent one additional death.
Vitamin D(3) combined with calcium increased the risk of nephrolithiasis (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.34, I(2) = 0%).
Alfacalcidol and calcitriol increased the risk of hypercalcaemia (RR 3.18, 95% CI 1.17 to 8.68, I(2) = 17%).
Data on health-related quality of life and health economics were inconclusive.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D in the form of vitamin D(3) seems to decrease mortality in predominantly elderly women who are mainly in institutions and dependent care.
Vitamin D(2), alfacalcidol, and calcitriol had no statistically significant effect on mortality.
Vitamin D(3) combined with calcium significantly increased nephrolithiasis.
Both alfacalcidol and calcitriol significantly increased hypercalcaemia.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
CLICK HERE to access the long paper
- 6% relative risk REDUCTION when supplementing with vitamin D3
- 2% relative risk INCREASE when supplementing with vitamin D2
Nephrolithiasis = Kidney stones, probably when have too much Calcium
- Overview Vitamin D3 better than D2
- Cochrane – 800 IU vitamin D decreased mortality by 6 percent – July 2011
- All items in category Mortality and Vitamin D
- Doubling vitamin D levels would reduce mortality rates about 10 percent – July 2011
- All items in Kidney Stones and vitamin D
- Mortality and vitamin D has the following chartVitamin D3 but not D2 reduces mortality – meta-analysis July 2011
5586 visitors, last modified 13 Feb, 2022,This page is in the following categories (# of items in each category)