Many ways have been proposed to fight COVID-19.
Some of the ways have been proven to be effective by both observations and clinical trials
- professional medical organizations,
- vaccine manufacturers, and
appear to down-play or reject alternatives.
In a few cases, the rejection also resulted in threatening or firing one of the proponents.
This is not science-based medicine. This is politics-based or dollar-based medicine
In the past, doctors were encouraged to try new treatments.
If the treatment worked, they were rewarded in many ways.
Now, however, doctors are actively discouraged from exploring treatments that are not the standard of practice
Table of contents
- Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (Ivermectin, etc)
from their FAQ
We are PhD researchers, scientists, people who hope to make a contribution, even if it is only very minor.
You can find our research in journals like Science and Nature.
For examples of why we can't be more specific search for "raoult death threats" or "simone gold fired".
updates at https://c19early.com/
https://c19ivermectin.com/ has full details
https://c19study.com/ has full details
https://c19vitamind.com/ has full details
As of Sept 15, 2021, the page had: 34 trials, 6 trial results, 23 meta-analyses and reviews, 63 observations, 35 recommendations, 55 associations, 89 speculations, 46 videos see related: Governments, HealthProblems, Hospitals, Dark Skins, 26 risk factors are ALL associated with low Vit D, Recent Virus pages Fight COVID-19 with 50K Vit D weekly Vaccines
- 10 reasons Why are doctors reluctant to accept vitamin D
- Tethen reason: ""It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary is dependent upon his not understanding it"
- Note: The founder of VitaminDWiki has no job to lose - he is retired
- Note: No fear of the FDA - VitaminDWiki has nothing to sell
Ivermectin and COVID-19 includes the following comparision
|Dosing for Prevention||weekly||weekly|
|Availability for humans||Prescription|
|Form||Oral||Oral, topical, etc|
Prevent, treat, long-haul
|All phases|| Prevent - Great|
Early treat - Good
Late treat - poor
|Allowed for COVID-19||In some places||in some places|
|Safe: # of doses|
given in 50 years
|> 3 billion||> 3 billion|
|Able to deal with virus|
that has mutated
|Fight more than just COVID-19||unsure||Proven 90+ health problems|
Clipped from Real Clear Politics March 10, 2021
I’ve experienced such censorship firsthand. Early in the pandemic, my research led me to testify in the Senate that corticosteroids were life-saving against COVID-19, when all national and international health care agencies recommended against them. My recommendations were criticized, ignored and resisted such that I felt forced to resign my faculty position. Only later did a large study from Oxford University find they were indeed life-saving. Overnight, they became the standard of care worldwide. More recently, we identified through dozens of trials that the drug ivermectin leads to large reductions in transmission, mortality, and time to clinical recovery. After testifying to this fact in a second Senate appearance — the video of which was removed by YouTube after garnering over 8 million views — I was forced to leave another position.
There were 203 comments on that page 1 day later
I-Mask+. is centered around ivermectin, a well-known, FDA-approved anti-parasite drug that has been used successfully for more than four decades to treat onchocerciasis “river blindness” and other parasitic diseases. It is one of the safest drugs known. It is on the WHO’s list of essential medicines, has been given 3.7 billion times around the globe,
Meta-analysis of alternative COVID-19 treatments PDF
Date unknown: Suspect Feb 2021
Note: Vitamin D uniquely also helps BEFORE infection