Toggle Health Problems and D

Breast Cancer 3X more likely if low vitamin D (Principal Component Analysis) – Sept 2019

Serum ‘Vitamin-Mineral’ Profiles: Associations with Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk Including Dietary Patterns and Supplementation. A Case-Control Study

Nutrients 2019, 11(9), 2244; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11092244


Overview Breast Cancer and Vitamin D contains the following summary and sections

Breast Cancer incidence also depends on VItamin D Genes

 Download the PDF from VitaminDWiki

Beata Krusinska 1,*,Lidia Wadolowska ,Maciej Biernacki 2,Malgorzata Anna Slowinska 1 and Marek Drozdowski 3
1 Department of Human Nutrition, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Sloneczna 45f, 10-718 Olsztyn, Poland
2 Department of Surgery, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 11-041 Olsztyn, Poland
3 Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 11-041 Olsztyn, Poland

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in females worldwide. Studies evaluating the blood vitamins and minerals status in the breast cancer etiology are limited, and the results are inconclusive. This study analyzed the association between serum vitamin-mineral profiles (V-MPs) and breast cancer (BC) risk with including dietary patterns (DPs) and the use of supplements. This case-control study involved 420 women aged 40–79 years from north-eastern Poland, including 190 newly diagnosed breast cancer cases. The fasting serum concentrations of vitamins (folate, cobalamin, 25(OH) vitamin D) and minerals (iron, calcium, magnesium) were measured in 129 post-menopausal women, including 82 controls and 47 cases. Three V-MPs were derived with a Principal Component Analysis (PCA). A logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the breast cancer risk associated with serum V-MPs and serum levels of single biomarkers. The risk of BC was lower by 88% (OR: 0.12; 95% Cl: 0.02–0.88; p < 0.05) in the upper tertile of the serum ‘Iron-Calcium’ profile compared to the bottom tertile, lower by 67% (OR: 0.33; 95% Cl: 0.11–0.97; p < 0.05) at the level of serum 25(OH) vitamin D ≥24.6 ng/mL and lower by 68% (OR: 0.32; 95% Cl: 0.11–0.91; p < 0.05) at the level of serum calcium ≥9.6 mg/dL. There was an inverse association of the serum ‘Magnesium’ profile or serum level of iron with the risk of BC, which disappeared after adjustment for the set of confounders accounted for: age, body mass index (BMI), socioeconomic status, overall physical activity, smoking status, age at menarche, number of full-term pregnancies, oral contraceptive use, hormone-replacement therapy use, family history of breast cancer, vitamin/mineral supplement use, the molecular subtype of breast cancer, and dietary patterns. No significant association was found between BC risk and the serum ‘Folate-Cobalamin-Vitamin D’ profile or serum folate, cobalamin or magnesium considered separately. These findings highlight that a higher-normal serum level of both iron and calcium, considered together as the serum profile, as well as a higher-normal serum level of calcium, considered separately, and a slightly below the normal range of serum vitamin D level may protect against breast cancer among postmenopausal women, independent of dietary patterns or the use of vitamin/mineral supplements. Therefore, the maintenance of the adequate status of vitamins and minerals and the regular monitoring of their blood markers should be included in breast cancer prevention.

Created by admin. Last Modification: Wednesday September 18, 2019 13:01:33 GMT-0000 by admin. (Version 3)

Attached files

ID Name Comment Uploaded Size Downloads
12656 Breast Cancer PCA.jpg admin 18 Sep, 2019 81.84 Kb 576
12655 Breast Cancer Vitamin Mineral PCA.pdf admin 18 Sep, 2019 431.42 Kb 513