Supporting non-standard but proven ways to fight COVID-19 can result in job loss
Many ways have been proposed to fight COVID-19.
Some of the ways have been proven to be effective by both observations and clinical trials
However, most
professional medical organizations,
vaccine manufacturers, and
governments
appear to down-play or reject alternatives.
In a few cases, the rejection also resulted in threatening or firing one of the proponents.
This is not science-based medicine. This is politics-based or dollar-based medicine
In the past, doctors were encouraged to try new treatments.
If the treatment worked, they were rewarded in many ways.
Now, however, doctors are actively discouraged from exploring treatments that are not the standard of practice
COVIDAnalysis
Actively keeps private due to past problems
We are PhD researchers, scientists, people who hope to make a contribution, even if it is only very minor.
You can find our research in journals like Science and Nature.
For examples of why we can't be more specific search for "raoult death threats" or "simone gold fired".
All studies as of March 11, 2021

updates at https://c19early.com/
Ivermectin

https://c19ivermectin.com/ has full details
Where Ivermectin is being used
Hydroxychloroquine

https://c19study.com/ has full details
Vitamin D

https://c19vitamind.com/ has full details
VitaminDWiki
COVID-19 treated by Vitamin D - studies, reports, videos
{include}
10 reasons 21 reasons why doctors are reluctant to accept Vitamin D
- Tethen reason: ""It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary is dependent upon his not understanding it"
Note: The founder of VitaminDWiki has no job to lose - he is retired
Note: No fear of the FDA - VitaminDWiki has nothing to sell
Ivermetin in VitaminDWiki
Ivermectin and COVID-19 - many studies includes the following comparision
{include}
Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (Ivermectin, etc)
Lost his job -twice
Clipped from Real Clear Politics March 10, 2021
I’ve experienced such censorship firsthand. Early in the pandemic, my research led me to testify in the Senate that corticosteroids were life-saving against COVID-19, when all national and international health care agencies recommended against them. My recommendations were criticized, ignored and resisted such that I felt forced to resign my faculty position . Only later did a large study from Oxford University find they were indeed life-saving. Overnight, they became the standard of care worldwide. More recently, we identified through dozens of trials that the drug ivermectin leads to large reductions in transmission, mortality, and time to clinical recovery. After testifying to this fact in a second Senate appearance — the video of which was removed by YouTube after garnering over 8 million views — I was forced to leave another position.
There were 203 comments on that page 1 day later
https://covid19criticalcare.com/
I-Mask+. is centered around ivermectin , a well-known, FDA-approved anti-parasite drug that has been used successfully for more than four decades to treat onchocerciasis “river blindness” and other parasitic diseases. It is one of the safest drugs known. It is on the WHO’s list of essential medicines, has been given 3.7 billion times around the globe,
Timeline of COVID-19 progression
📄 Meta-analysis of alternative COVID-19 treatments PDF
Date unknown: Suspect Feb 2021

Note: Vitamin D uniquely also helps BEFORE infection