Study urged a global moratorium on mRNA vaccines (300 peer reviewers agreed)
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign
Cureus . 2024 Jan 24;16(1):e52876. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52876. eCollection 2024 Jan.
M Nathaniel Mead 1, Stephanie Seneff 2, Russ Wolfinger 3, Jessica Rose 4, Kris Denhaerynck 5, Steve Kirsch 6, Peter A McCullough 7 8
Biology and Nutritional Epidemiology, Independent Research, Copper Hill, USA
Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA
Biostatistics and Epidemiology,Independent Research, Research Triangle Park, USA
Immunology and Public Health Research, Independent Research, Ottawa, CAN
Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Independent Research, Basel, CHE
Data Science, Independent Research, Los Angeles, USA
Cardiology, Epidemiology, and Public Health, McCullough Foundation, Dallas, USA
Cardiology, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Truth for Health Foundation, Tucson, USA
Our understanding of COVID-19 vaccinations and their impact on health and mortality has evolved substantially since the first vaccine rollouts. Published reports from the original randomized phase 3 trials concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could greatly reduce COVID-19 symptoms. In the interim, problems with the methods, execution, and reporting of these pivotal trials have emerged. Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group. Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, hematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders. Furthermore, these products never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing in accordance with previously established scientific standards. Among the other major topics addressed in this narrative review are the published analyses of serious harms to humans, quality control issues and process-related impurities, mechanisms underlying adverse events (AEs), the immunologic basis for vaccine inefficacy, and concerning mortality trends based on the registrational trial data. The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the evidence to date contraindicates further booster injections and suggests that, at a minimum, the mRNA injections should be removed from the childhood immunization program until proper safety and toxicological studies are conducted. Federal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits.
Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.
📄 Download the PDF from VitaminDWiki
Clipped from PDF
"..for every life saved, there were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mRNA injections "
Giant Mistake to Mass Vaccinate the World - 10 minute video discussion of the study
Epidemiologist M. Nathaniel Mead, Dr. McCullough, On Grant Stinchield Tonight
M. Nathaniel Mead, MSc = former NIH staff writer and epidemiologist
VitaminDWiki – COVID-19 treated by Vitamin D - studies, reports, videos
{include}

- The above image is automatically updated
VitaminDWiki COVID infections and vaccinations decrease Vitamin D – many studies
{include}
VitaminDWiki - Excess deaths - 5 possible reasons - many studies
("number needed to treat" OR NNT) "vitamin D" COVID" range from 4 to 30
>600 studies matched search criterial as of Feb 2024
VitaminDWiki - Number of people to treat to prevent 1 case of flu: Vitamin D 4, Vaccination 40 – Feb 2017
Publisher "decided" to remove the study - Feb 2024
The concerns include, but are not limited to:
We find that the article is misrepresenting all-cause mortality data
We find that the article appears to be misrepresenting VAERs data
The article states that the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine saved two lives and caused 27 deaths per 100,000 vaccinations, and the Moderna vaccine saved 3.9 lives and caused 10.8 deaths per 100,000 vaccinations, though there does not appear to be convincing evidence for this claim.
Incorrect claim: Vaccines are gene therapy products.
The article states that vaccines are contaminated with high levels of DNA. Upon review we found that the cited references are not sufficient to support these claims.
The article states that SV40 promoter can cause cancer because SV40 virus can cause cancer in some organisms and inconclusively in humans. However, we find that this is misrepresenting the cited study (Li, S., MacLaughlin, F., Fewell, J. et al. Muscle-specific enhancement of gene expression by incorporation of SV40 enhancer in the expression plasmid. Gene Ther 8, 494–497 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3301419
The article states that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines did not undergo adequate safety and efficacy testing, which the journal considers to be incorrect
The article incorrectly states that spike proteins produced by COVID-19 vaccination linger in the body and cause adverse effects.
Removal of paper violated Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Guidelines
- "It topped >330,000 views/reads/downloads in a month as compared to an average Cureus-promoted paper which has only ~2700 in a year."
includes the full response by the author's of the study
274+ VitaminDWiki pages have VACCIN, BOOSTER, etc in the title
This list is automatically updated
{LIST()}