Eur Respir J 2020; in press https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.04234-2020
Subset of PDF table
As of Augest 11, 2022, the VitaminDWiki page had: 34 trials, 11 trial results, 37 meta-analyses and reviews, 69 observations, 38 recommendations, 55 associations, 89 speculations, 58 videos, 45 Mortality studies see related: Governments, HealthProblems, Hospitals, Dark Skins, 26 risk factors are ALL associated with low Vit D, Recent Virus pages Fight COVID-19 with 50K Vit D weekly Vaccines Take lots of Vitamin D at first signs of COVID 116 COVID Clinical Trials using Vitamin D (08/2022)
5 most-recently changed Virus entries
- Lower Magnesium, 6 percent more COVID - Feb 2022
- “Black Patients Matter”: US Blacks 2X more likely to die of COVID-19 than whites – Sept 29, 2021
- Virus and Dark Skin in VitaminDWiki
- US coalition of Black and Latino churches hope to reduce the 3X COVID-19 disparity - Aug 2021
- COVID-19 mortality for Blacks is 5X that for whites in 2 LA Hospitals - July 2021
- Low vitamin D associated with increased COVID-19 risk (in this case black women 1.7X) – July 2021
- COVID-19 was the third-leading cause of death in the US, especially in those with dark skins - April 1, 2021
- Prefer 40 – 60 ng of Vitamin D to minimize COVID-19 – March 17, 2021
- 26 health factors increase the risk of COVID-19 – all are proxies for low vitamin D
- Those with recent cancer diagnosis had 7X increased risk of COVID-19 (more if A-A )- Dec 2020
- Healthcare workers at higher risk of COVID-19 if low vitamin D, especially if dark skin – Dec 2020
- Shift workers 2X more likely to get COVID-19 (low Vitamin D) - Dec 2020
- COVID-19 was killing dark-skinned doctors, then they got a Vitamin D recommendation
- COVID-19 antibodies 2.6 X more likely if had symptoms and low vitamin D (UK hospital staff)– Oct 5 2020
- Vitamin D could knock out COVID-19 in 3 months – Dr. Matthews interview Oct 2020
- Rate of COVID-19 test positive is 40 pcnt lower if high vitamin D (192,000 people) - Holick Sept 2020
- COVID-19 increased 3.5 X if Ultra-Orthodox (cloth) Sept, 2020
- COVID-19 is harder for those with dark skins - perhaps due to low vitamin D – April 24, 2020
- COVID-19 more frequent and deadly for those with dark skins (high risk of low vitamin D)
- Indications of increase COVID-19 problems if dark skin in the UK- April 3 2020
Aduragbemi A Faniyi, Sebastian T Lugg, Sian E Faustini, Craig Webster, Joanne E Duffy, Martin Hewison, Adrian Shields, Peter Nightingale, Alex G Richter, David R Thickett
Aduragbemi A Faniyi,1* Sebastian T Lugg,1* Sian E Faustini,2 Craig Webster,3 Joanne E Duffy,3 Martin Hewison,4 Adrian Shields,2,3 Peter Nightingale,3 Alex G Richter,2,3** David R Thickett.1,3** d.thickett at bham.ac.uk
1 Birmingham Acute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
2 Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
3 University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
4 Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Take home message NHS staff with vitamin D deficiency were more likely to have developed COVID-19, with staff from BAME ethnicity being the most vitamin D deficient.
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is a global health emergency, resulting in over 50 million infections and over 1.2 million deaths as of mid-November 2020 . Healthcare workers are at a high risk of COVID-19 with large numbers of deaths reported around Europe and the UK, particularly in Black Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) staff . COVID-19 has disproportionately affected BAME individuals even after accounting for age, sex, social deprivation, and co-morbidity .
Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is common in those of BAME ethnicity . In VDD, both innate and adaptive immunity becomes dysregulated, increasing the risk of respiratory infection as seen in influenza, common cold viruses and tuberculosis [5, 6]. There has been a great deal of interest in the role of VDD in COVID-19, with recent evidence suggesting VDD is more frequent in patients with severe COVID-19 compared to mild cases . The prevalence of VDD and association with COVID-19 in healthcare workers has not been investigated.
We hypothesised that VDD was more common in healthcare workers who have seroconverted for COVID-19. This study defined the factors associated with VDD and the relationship between COVID-19 seroconversion and VDD.
This cross-sectional observational study recruited healthcare workers between 12th and 22nd May 2020 from the University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHBFT) across four sites. This was a sub-study of the COVID-19 convalescent immunity study (COCO) approved by the London - Camden & Kings Cross Research Ethics Committee (20/HRA/1817). The main inclusion criteria were staff members who had isolated for symptoms suggestive of COVID-19. After obtaining consent, blood samples were taken for measurement of vitamin D levels by mass spectrometry, and anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein antibodies using a combined IgG, IgA, IgM ELISA (The Binding Site, Product code: MK654) . This CE marked assay has 98.6% (95% CI: 92.6-100) sensitivity and 98.3% (95% CI: 96.4-99.4) specificity. The median time from symptom onset to sample collection was 48 days. COVID-19 seroconversion was used to indicate previous infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
VDD was defined as serum 25(OH)D3 concentration < 30 nmol/l as per the UHBFT clinical laboratory reference range and the UK National Osteoporosis Society guidance .
Of the 392 healthcare workers studied, 61 (15.6%) had VDD. The participant demographics, occupation and seroconversion status are displayed in table 1. Those with VDD were significantly more likely to be BAME (p<0.0001) and in a junior doctor job role (p=0.029); there were no differences in age, body mass index (BMI) or co-morbidity status between those with VDD and those without. Using backwards logistic regression to determine factors associated with VDD, the multivariate analysis used all demographic variables in table 1.
The significant independent factors for VDD were BAME (OR 8·86, 95%CI 4.75– 16.52; p<0.001) and seroconversion (OR 2.15, 95%CI 1.11–4.17; p=0.023). The overall predictive power of the model was 77.9% (95%CI 71.1–84.7, SE 3.5%; p<0.001) indicated by the area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve.
Self-reported symptoms in healthcare workers (n=386), included fever (n=235, 61%), breathlessness (n=186, 48%), cough (n=117, 30%), loss of smell/taste (n=169, 44%), body aches/pains (n=274, 71%), fatigue (n=339, 88%), diarrhoea (n=115, 30%), and sore throat (n=197, 51%). VDD staff experienced more body aches/pains (82% versus 69%; p=0.045) but there were no significant differences in other symptoms reported between groups.
Seroconversion was higher in healthcare workers with VDD compared to those without (n=44/61, 72% versus n=170/331, 51%; p=0.003), representing an absolute increase of 13 cases in the VDD group. Seroconversion was higher in BAME males with VDD compared to those without (n=17/18, 94% versus n=12/23, 52%; p=0.005); no differences were observed in the other ethnic-gender sub-analysis. Using backwards logistic regression to determine factors associated with seroconversion, the multivariate analysis used all the variables from table 1; only VDD was a significant independent risk factor for developing seroconversion (OR 2.6, 95%CI 1.41–4.80; p=0.002). The overall predictive power of the model was 55·5% (95%CI 49.8–61.2, SE 2.9%; p=0.06) as indicated by the area under the ROC curve.
To our knowledge this is the first study to investigate VDD prevalence in a UK healthcare worker cohort. VDD was relatively uncommon (15·6%) and lower than healthcare worker studies published in the USA and Gulf Areas, which may in part reflect differences in reference ranges and vitamin D assays used . The increase in VDD seen in junior doctors echoes previous findings of junior doctors have lower levels than senior doctors , which may be due to increased frontline work and different shift patterns.
Our data supports previous findings of higher VDD in BAME ethnicity . While BAME was not an independent risk factor for seroconversion, our sub-group analysis found that VDD BAME males may be most at risk from COVID-19 as there was remarkably high seroconversion rate of 94% in this sub-group.
Although this is a cohort of mild COVID-19, being BAME and male are known risk factors for a severe outcome from COVID-19.
Our study showing VDD as an independent risk factor for COVID-19 seroconversion is consistent with others including a large US study which found that COVID-19 positivity was inversely related to patient vitamin D levels in the preceding 12 months . Additional data from Israel found low vitamin D increased the risk of COVID-19 positivity and COVID-19 related hospitalisation . Furthermore, a recent open labelled clinical trial from Spain provided a proof of concept that high-dose vitamin D treatment may be useful therapy for severe COVID-19 .
The role of vitamin D in modulating the immune response to COVID-19 is likely to be multifactorial. Vitamin D increases the production of antimicrobial peptides in the respiratory epithelium, which may protect against viral infection. Also, vitamin D supplementation has been shown to reduce viral upper respiratory tract infections in metanalysis . Vitamin D may help reduce the body’s response to COVID-19; older patients with VDD (<30 nmol/l) had higher D-dimer levels, a marker of inflammation and vascular damage, and required more non-invasive ventilation support . There is a bidirectional association between VDD and COVID-19 in our study and therefore it is unclear if VDD is a cause and/or consequence of COVID-19.
This study has several limitations. Firstly, staff were recruited from a single NHS trust, although it is the second largest in the UK spanning four hospital sites. Secondly, as the healthcare workers had mild COVID-19, this study does not inform of the role of VDD in severe COVID-19. Thirdly, due to relatively small sample size, we were unable to analyse the differences between staff from different BAME sub
groups. Fourthly, there is a risk of bias from recruiting individuals with self-reported symptoms compared to a cross-sectional survey of all healthcare workers. Finally, other confounders such as sociocultural factors which may affect risk of transmission and/or VDD were not addressed.
In summary, in healthcare workers who have isolated due to symptoms of COVID-19, those of BAME ethnicity are at the highest risk of VDD. Furthermore, VDD was an independent risk factor for development of COVID-19 seroconversion, with the biggest differences seen in the BAME male group. Therefore, we suggest future high-dose vitamin D treatment trials should target such at risk groups within healthcare workers with aim of potentially preventing or alleviating COVID-19.
- 1. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. 2020 https://covid19.who.int Date last updated: 13th November 2020; date last accessed: 13th November 2020.
- 2. Exclusive: deaths of NHS staff from covid-19 analysed. 2020 https://www.hsj.co.uk/exclusive deaths-of-nhs-staff-from-covid-19-analysed/7027471.article Date last updated: 22nd April 2020; date last accessed: 13th November 2020.
- 3. Office for National Statistics. Coronavirus (COVID-19) related deaths by ethnic group, England and Wales: 2 March 2020 to 10 April 2020.
- https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/articles/c oronavirusrelateddeathsbyethnicgroupenglandandwales/2march2020to10april2020 Date last updated: 7th May 2020; date last accessed: 13th November 2020.
- 4. Webster C. Relationship of total 25-OH vitamin D concentrations to Indices of Multiple Deprivation: geoanalysis of laboratory results. Ann Clin Biochem 2013: 50(Pt 1): 31-38. 5. Greiller CL, Martineau AR. Modulation of the immune response to respiratory viruses by vitamin D. Nutrients 2015: 7(6): 4240-4270.
- 6. Nnoaham KE, Clarke A. Low serum vitamin D levels and tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2008: 37(1): 113-119.
- 7. Panagiotou G, Tee SA, Ihsan Y, et alLow serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) levels in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 are associated with greater disease severity. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2020. 8. Faustini SE, Jossi SE, Perez-Toledo M, et al. Detection of antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein in both serum and saliva enhances detection of infection. medRxiv 2020. 9. Aspray TJ, Bowring C, Fraser W, et al.. National Osteoporosis Society vitamin D guideline summary. Age Ageing 2014: 43(5): 592-595.
- 10. Sowah D, Fan X, Dennett L, et al. Vitamin D levels and deficiency with different occupations: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2017: 17(1): 519.
- 11. Kaufman HW, Niles JK, Kroll MH, et al. SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates associated with circulating 25- hydroxyvitamin D levels. PLoS One 2020: 15(9): e0239252.
- 12. Merzon E, Tworowski D, Gorohovski A, et al. Low plasma 25(OH) vitamin D level is associated with increased risk of COVID-19 infection: an Israeli population-based study. Febs j 2020. 13. Entrenas Castillo M, Entrenas Costa LM, Vaquero Barrios JM, et al. "Effect of calcifediol treatment and best available therapy versus best available therapy on intensive care unit admission and mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19: A pilot randomized clinical study". J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2020: 203: 105751.
- 14. Martineau AR, Jolliffe DA, Hooper RL, et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Bmj 2017: 356: i6583.
- 15. Baktash V, Hosack T, Patel N, et al. Vitamin D status and outcomes for hospitalised older patients with COVID-19. Postgrad Med J 2020.