- Non-genetic factors and breast cancer: an umbrella review of meta-analyses
- VitaminDWiki -
25 Breast Cancer meta-analyses - VitaminDWiki – Overview Breast Cancer and Vitamin D contains:
Non-genetic factors and breast cancer: an umbrella review of meta-analyses
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jul 26;24(1):903. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12641-8.
Anneza Yiallourou 1, Katerina Pantavou 1, Georgios Markozannes 2 3, Antonis Pilavas 1, Andrea Georgiou 1, Andria Hadjikou 1, Mary Economou 1, Neophytos Christodoulou 4, Konstantinos Letsos 1, Elina Khattab 1, Chrystalleni Kossyva 1, Maria Constantinou 1, Melanie Theodoridou 1, Daniele Piovani 5 6, Konstantinos Κ Tsilidis 2 3, Stefanos Bonovas 5 6, Georgios K Nikolopoulos 7
Background: Previous research has found associations between various non-genetic factors and breast cancer (BrCa) risk. This study summarises and appraises the credibility of the available evidence on the association between non-genetic factors and BrCa risk.Methods: We conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses. Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane databases were systematically searched for meta-analyses examining non-genetic factors and BrCa incidence or mortality. The strength of the evidence was graded in four categories (i.e., weak, suggestive, highly suggestive, convincing).
Results: A total of 781 meta-analyses from 280 publications were evaluated and graded. We included exposures related to anthropometric measurements, biomarkers, breast characteristics and diseases, diet and supplements, environment, exogenous hormones, lifestyle and social factors, medical history, medication, reproductive history, and pregnancy. The largest number of examined associations was found for the category of diet and supplements and for exposures such as aspirin use and active smoking. The statistically significant (P-value < 0.05) meta-analyses were 382 (49%), of which 204 (53.4%) reported factors associated with increased BrCa risk.
Most of the statistically significant evidence (n = 224, 58.6%) was graded as weak.
Convincing harmful associations with heightened BrCa risk were found for- increased body mass index (BMI),
- BMI and weight gain in postmenopausal women,
- oral contraceptive use in premenopausal women,
- increased androstenedione, estradiol, estrone, and testosterone concentrations,
- high Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) classification, and
- increased breast density.
Convincing protective factors associated with lower BrCa risk included high fiber intake and high sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels while highly suggestive protective factors included high 25 hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D] levels, adherence to healthy lifestyle, and moderate-vigorous physical activity.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest some highly modifiable factors that protect from BrCa. Interestingly, while diet was the most studied exposure category, the related associations failed to reach higher levels of evidence, indicating the methodological limitations in the field. To improve the validity of these associations, future research should utilise more robust study designs and better exposure assessment techniques. Overall, our study provides knowledge that supports the development of evidence-based BrCa prevention recommendations and guidance, both at an individual level and for public health initiatives.
 Download the PDF from VitaminDWiki
– – –
Highly convincing vitamin D data as from:
Song D, Deng Y, Liu K, Zhou L, Li N, Zheng Y, et al. Vitamin D intake, blood vitamin D levels, and the risk of breast cancer: a dose response meta-analysis of observational studies. Aging (Albany NY).2019;11:12708–32. in VitaminDWiki
Breast Cancer risk - meta-analysis of 50 studies - Dec 2019 which has:
VitaminDWiki -
25 Breast Cancer meta-analyses This list is automatically updated
- Analysis of 280 Breast Cancer meta-analyses: having low vitamin D was highly suggestive – umbrella July 2024
- Breast Cancer not prevented by vitamin D when use small doses or for just a short time – Meta-analysis April 2023
- Breast Cancer risk - meta-analysis of 50 studies - Dec 2019
- Deaths from many types of Cancer associated with low vitamin D- review of meta-analyses Sept 2020
- Breast Cancer again associated with low vitamin D – 15th meta-analysis Sept 2020
- Breast Cancer risk reduced 17 percent by 1 hour of daily summer sun – meta-analysis Jan 2020
- Breast Cancer reduced 20 percent by fish (Omega-3) – meta-analysis Feb 2019
- Breast Cancer rate reduced by 40 percent with Omega-3 – meta-analysis June 2013
- Breast Cancer Mortality reduced 60 percent if more than 60 ng of Vitamin D – meta-analysis June 2017
- Increased risk of some female cancers if low vitamin D (due to genes) – meta-analysis June 2015
- Cancer (colon, breast, lymph) survival about 2X better with high level vitamin D – meta-analysis July 2014
- Cancer survival 4 percent more likely with just a little more vitamin D (4 ng) - meta-analysis July 2014
- Death due to breast cancer reduced 40 percent if high vitamin D – meta-analysis April 2014
- More survive Breast Cancer if more vitamin D – 2X fewer deaths with just 30 ng -meta-analysis March 2014
- Colorectal and Breast Cancer – Vitamin D is associated with fewer deaths – meta-analysis Feb 2014
- Breast Cancer – review of 2 RCT did not find association with 1000 IU of Vitamin D – July 2013
- Breast Cancer post menopause down 12 percent for every 5 ng of vitamin D – meta-analysis May 2013
- 3.2 percent less Breast Cancer for 2.4 ng more vitamin D – meta-analysis June 2013
- Breast Cancer survival 2X more likely if vitamin D sufficient – meta-analysis May 2013
- Graphs of Vitamin D and Cancer – meta-analysis Dec 2011
- Meta-analysis not find low vitamin D years before breast cancer – Aug 2010
- Meta-analysis confirmed that vitamin D and calcium prevents breast cancer – June 2010
- Meta-analysis found vitamin D association with colon but not prostate nor breast cancer May 2010
- Breast cancer association with low vitamin D suggested by Meta-analysis -April 2010
- Meta-analysis did not find strong association between vitamin D and breast cancer risk -April 2010
VitaminDWiki – Overview Breast Cancer and Vitamin D contains:
-
25 Meta-analyses of Vitamin D and Breast Cancer
example: 2X reduction of deaths from Breast Cancer if have enough Vitamin D.- Appears that having lots of Vitamin D will reduce by 3 X the chance of Breast Cancer
wonder just how much more proof is needed- Breast Cancer 4X more likely if have poor genes
- Cancer - Breast category listing has
262 items along with related searches - Breast Cancer treatment – Vitamin D was the most-popular supplement – Jan 2023
- Breast Cancer again associated with low vitamin D – 15th meta-analysis Sept 2020
- Vitamin D reduced Breast Cancer mortality in 9 out of 9 studies, yet still no consensus – April 2019
- Vitamin D both prevents and treats Breast Cancer – 2019
Analysis of 280 Breast Cancer meta-analyses: having low vitamin D was highly suggestive – umbrella July 20241138 visitors, last modified 28 Jul, 2024, This page is in the following categories (# of items in each category)Attached files
ID Name Uploaded Size Downloads 21464 Robustness BC.webp admin 28 Jul, 2024 10.15 Kb 55 21463 Breast Cancer umbrella_CompressPdf.pdf admin 28 Jul, 2024 371.66 Kb 198 - Appears that having lots of Vitamin D will reduce by 3 X the chance of Breast Cancer